Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 25, 2020

Fletcher v. Guzman

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:20-cv-03082
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Fletcher v. Guzman, Judge McMahon dismissed the complaint without prejudice because Fletcher neither paid the fee nor submitted required forms.

Who this affects

Shawn Fletcher’s complaint was dismissed without prejudice because he did not submit the required forms or pay the filing fee. The court also denied him permission to appeal without paying fees.

What happened

In Fletcher v. Guzman, the court had ordered Shawn Fletcher to submit a request to proceed without paying filing fees and a prisoner authorization, or to pay the required $400 fee.

Fletcher did not submit the required forms or pay the fee within the time allowed by the court’s April 28, 2020 order.

Judge Colleen McMahon dismissed the complaint without prejudice and denied Fletcher permission to appeal without paying fees because the court certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Fletcher v. Guzman · No. 1:20-cv-03082
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
June 25, 2020

Background

On April 28, 2020, the court directed Shawn Fletcher to submit a completed application to proceed without paying filing fees and a prisoner authorization, or to pay the $400 required to file a civil action. The order warned that failing to comply would result in dismissal.

Ruling

The court found that Fletcher had not submitted the application and prisoner authorization or paid the filing fee. It therefore dismissed the complaint without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914 and 1915.

Appeal-Fee Ruling

The court certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without paying fees. The clerk was directed to mail Fletcher a copy of the order and record service on the docket.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.