Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 29, 2020

Carter v. New York Stock Exchange,

Judge
Louis Stanton
Docket
1:20-cv-04823
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Carter v. New York Stock Exchange, Judge McMahon ordered the incarcerated plaintiff to pay fees or submit forms to proceed without upfront payment.

Who this affects

Terence Mack Carter, an incarcerated plaintiff proceeding without a lawyer, was required to pay the fees or submit the specified forms within 30 days to avoid dismissal of the action.

What happened

Terence Mack Carter sued the New York Stock Exchange while incarcerated and without a lawyer. He submitted his complaint without paying the required fees or filing the forms needed to request permission to proceed without paying upfront.

The court explained that Carter had to either pay $400 in fees or submit a signed application and authorization allowing filing-fee payments to be deducted from his prisoner account in installments.

Judge Colleen McMahon gave Carter 30 days to comply and said the case would be dismissed if he did not. She also denied permission to appeal without paying fees, finding that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Carter v. New York Stock Exchange, · No. 1:20-cv-04823
Judge
Louis Stanton
Date
June 29, 2020

Background

Terence Mack Carter brought this civil action without a lawyer while incarcerated at the Federal Correctional Institution in Mendota, California. He filed the complaint without paying the required fees and without submitting a completed application to proceed without prepaying fees or a prisoner authorization.

Payment and filing requirements

The court stated that a prisoner must either pay $400 in fees—a $350 filing fee and a $50 administrative fee—or request permission to proceed without prepaying fees. To make that request, Carter had to submit a signed application and a prisoner authorization. The authorization directs the correctional facility to deduct the $350 filing fee from the prisoner's account in installments and requires certified copies of account statements for the preceding six months to be sent to the court. The court also noted that the $50 administrative fee does not apply to a person granted permission to proceed without prepaying fees.

Order

Judge Colleen McMahon ordered Carter, within 30 days of the order, either to pay the $400 in fees or submit the required application and prisoner authorization. The documents were to identify docket number 20-CV-4823 (CM). The Clerk of Court was directed to mail the order to Carter and record service on the docket. No summons was to issue at that time. The order stated that, if Carter complied, the case would be processed under the Clerk's Office procedures; if he failed to comply within the allowed time, the court would dismiss the action.

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The court also cautioned that a later dismissal for frivolousness, maliciousness, or failure to state a claim could count as a statutory "strike" affecting Carter's ability to proceed without prepaying fees in future federal civil actions.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.