Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 7, 2020

Passante v. Luzzo's 211, LLC

Judge
Stewart Aaron
Docket
1:20-cv-04771
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
BankruptcyCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Passante v. Luzzo’s 211, LLC, Judge Woods held bankruptcy automatically stayed proceedings against Luzzo’s, but not Michele Iuliano.

Who this affects

The automatic stay pauses the proceedings against Luzzo’s 211, LLC, the bankruptcy debtor. It does not automatically pause the proceedings against Michele Iuliano.

What happened

In Passante v. Luzzo’s 211, LLC, the court addressed Luzzo’s filing for Chapter 7 bankruptcy during the case brought by Mario Passante.

The court said the bankruptcy filing automatically paused the proceedings against Luzzo’s under federal bankruptcy law. It also said the proceedings against Michele Iuliano were not automatically paused.

Judge Gregory H. Woods ordered no separate stay of the proceedings against Iuliano and left them unstayed unless the court later ordered otherwise.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Passante v. Luzzo's 211, LLC · No. 1:20-cv-04771
Judge
Stewart Aaron
Date
July 7, 2020

Background

Mario Passante brought this action against Luzzo’s 211, LLC and Michele Iuliano. The court received a letter stating that Luzzo’s had filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy.

Court’s analysis

The court explained that federal bankruptcy law automatically pauses proceedings against a bankruptcy debtor under 11 U.S.C. § 362(a)(1). It therefore stated that the proceedings against Luzzo’s were automatically stayed. The court relied on Second Circuit decisions explaining that this automatic stay generally applies to the debtor and does not automatically extend to nonbankrupt co-defendants.

Ruling and effect

The court stated that, unless it later ordered otherwise, the proceedings against Michele Iuliano were not stayed. The opinion does not state that the court dismissed the case, entered judgment, or issued any other ruling on the underlying claims.

Judge

The order was signed by Gregory H. Woods, United States District Judge.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.