Franco v. New York City Department of Education
- Katherine Failla
- 1:19-cv-02925
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Franco v. New York City Department of Education, Judge Failla ordered the Department to respond by July 15, 2020, to plaintiffs’ letter about possible dismissal.
Miriam Franco, Ramon Carmona, K.C., and the New York City Department of Education. The Department was required to respond to the plaintiffs’ letter by July 15, 2020, in a letter brief of no more than ten pages.
What happened
In Franco v. New York City Department of Education, the plaintiffs argued that a Second Circuit decision did not require the court to dismiss their action.
The court ordered the New York City Department of Education to respond to the plaintiffs’ July 2, 2020 letter by July 15, 2020, in a letter brief of no more than ten pages.
Judge Katherine Polk Failla issued this order. The order did not decide whether the case should be dismissed.
The detailed version
- Franco v. New York City Department of Education · No. 1:19-cv-02925
- Katherine Failla
- July 7, 2020
Background
The court received a July 2, 2020 letter from Miriam Franco and Ramon Carmona. The letter argued that the Second Circuit’s decision in Ventura de Paulino v. New York City Department of Education did not require dismissal of this action.
Order
The court ordered the New York City Department of Education to respond to the plaintiffs’ letter by July 15, 2020. The response had to be a letter brief no longer than ten pages.
Effect
This was a procedural order requiring a response. It did not decide whether the action should be dismissed or resolve the underlying dispute. Judge Katherine Polk Failla signed the order.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.