Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 7, 2020

Paulino v. Royce

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:20-cv-05067
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
HabeasPro SeCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Paulino v. Royce, Chief Judge McMahon ordered the petitioner to pay the fee or request permission to proceed without prepayment.

Who this affects

Jovanny Paulino, the self-represented petitioner, must either pay the filing fee or submit a signed application to proceed without prepaying fees within 30 days; otherwise, the action will be dismissed.

What happened

Paulino v. Royce is a habeas petition filed by Jovanny Paulino, who was representing himself. He submitted the petition without paying the filing fee or including an application to proceed without paying fees upfront.

The court gave Paulino 30 days to pay the $5 filing fee or submit a signed application requesting permission to proceed without prepayment. The application had to include the case number. No summons would be issued at that time.

Chief Judge Colleen McMahon ordered the Clerk's Office to mail the order to Paulino and record service. If Paulino did not comply within 30 days, the action would be dismissed. The court also denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Paulino v. Royce · No. 1:20-cv-05067
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
July 7, 2020

Background

Jovanny Paulino, proceeding without a lawyer, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The opinion states that he submitted the petition without the required $5 filing fee and without an application to proceed without prepaying fees.

Order

The court directed Paulino, within 30 days of the order, to do one of two things: pay the $5 filing fee or submit a signed application requesting permission to proceed without prepaying fees. If he submitted the application, it was to be labeled with docket number 20-CV-5067 (CM). The court explained that approval of the application would allow him to proceed without prepaying the fee.

The Clerk of Court was directed to mail the order to Paulino and note service on the docket. No summons was to issue at that time. The court stated that the case would be processed under the Clerk's Office procedures if Paulino complied, but that the action would be dismissed if he failed to comply within the allowed time.

Appeal and disposition

Chief Judge Colleen McMahon certified that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. This order addressed filing-fee and fee-waiver requirements; it did not decide the merits of Paulino's habeas petition.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.