Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 7, 2020

Coston v. NYS DOCCS

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:20-cv-00350
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureMotion to Dismiss
In one sentence

In Coston v. NYS DOCCS, Judge McMahon dismissed the complaint after Ashante Coston failed to amend it and denied fee-free status for any appeal.

Who this affects

Ashante Coston, whose complaint was dismissed and whose permission to appeal without paying filing fees was denied.

What happened

In Coston v. NYS DOCCS, the court had ordered Ashante Coston to file an amended complaint within 60 days and warned that failing to do so would lead to dismissal.

Coston did not file an amended complaint, so the court dismissed the complaint. The court also ruled that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without paying filing fees.

Judge Colleen McMahon issued the dismissal order on July 7, 2020. The order does not state whether the dismissal was with or without prejudice.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Coston v. NYS DOCCS · No. 1:20-cv-00350
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
July 7, 2020

Background

On March 11, 2020, the court ordered Ashante Coston to file an amended complaint within 60 days. The order warned that failing to comply would result in dismissal. The opinion states that Coston had filed the complaint without paying the filing fee under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1).

Ruling

Coston did not file an amended complaint. The court therefore dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i1), as that provision is printed in the opinion. The court did not discuss the underlying claims.

Judge Colleen McMahon also directed the Clerk of Court to mail the order to Coston and record service on the docket. The court certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without paying filing fees. The opinion does not state whether the dismissal was with or without prejudice.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.