Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 7, 2020

Kellier v. Acosta

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:20-cv-01058
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Kellier v. Acosta, Judge McMahon dismissed the complaint after Joshua Kellier failed to file the required amended complaint.

Who this affects

Joshua Kellier’s complaint was dismissed because he did not file the required amended complaint. The court also denied him permission to appeal without paying the filing fee.

What happened

In Kellier v. Acosta, the court had ordered Joshua Kellier to file an amended complaint within 60 days. The order warned that failing to do so would result in dismissal.

Kellier did not file an amended complaint. The court therefore dismissed his complaint, which had been filed without paying the filing fee.

Chief Judge Colleen McMahon also denied Kellier permission to appeal without paying the filing fee, finding that an appeal would not be taken in good faith. The order does not decide the underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Kellier v. Acosta · No. 1:20-cv-01058
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
July 7, 2020

Background

On March 23, 2020, the court directed Joshua Kellier to file an amended complaint within 60 days. The court expressly warned that failure to comply would result in dismissal. Kellier did not file an amended complaint.

Ruling

Chief United States District Judge Colleen McMahon dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i1), as that citation appears in the opinion. The order does not address the merits of Kellier’s underlying claims.

Appeal and Service

The Clerk of Court was directed to mail Kellier a copy of the order and record service on the docket. The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without paying the filing fee.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.