Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 8, 2020

Yeremis v. Charter Communications Inc

Judge
Gregory Woods
Docket
1:20-cv-04723
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Yeremis v. Charter Communications Inc, Judge Woods ordered service through Marshals and extended the service deadline, without deciding the claims.

Who this affects

Arturo Yeremis and the four named defendants: Amerit Fleet Solutions, Charter Communications Inc., A-1 All German Car Corporation, and the City of New York Police Department. The order directs the Clerk of Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to handle service.

What happened

In Yeremis v. Charter Communications Inc, Arturo Yeremis brought claims alleging discrimination based on race, color, and/or national origin, aiding and abetting discrimination, conversion, and negligent infliction of emotional stress. The court had already allowed him to proceed without paying filing fees.

The court ordered the Clerk to issue summonses and prepare service forms for Amerit Fleet Solutions, Charter Communications Inc., A-1 All German Car Corporation, and the City of New York Police Department. The U.S. Marshals Service will handle service, and the deadline was extended to 90 days after the summonses are issued. The order did not decide whether Yeremis’s claims have merit.

Judge Gregory H. Woods also required Yeremis to notify the court of any address change and certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith, denying fee-free status for an appeal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Yeremis v. Charter Communications Inc · No. 1:20-cv-04723
Judge
Gregory Woods
Date
July 8, 2020

Background

Arturo Yeremis sued Amerit Fleet Solutions, Charter Communications Inc., A-1 All German Car Corporation, and the City of New York Police Department. The opinion says he asserted claims for discrimination based on race, color, and/or national origin; aiding and abetting discrimination; conversion; and negligent infliction of emotional stress. On June 29, 2020, the court allowed Yeremis to proceed without prepaying court fees.

Service of Process

Because Yeremis was allowed to proceed without prepaying fees, the court held that he could rely on the Clerk of Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendants. The court extended the usual 90-day service period to 90 days after the summonses are issued. It stated that, if service is not completed within that period, Yeremis should request an extension of time.

The court instructed the Clerk to complete a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form for each defendant, issue the summonses, and provide the Marshals Service with the documents needed to complete service. The court also required Yeremis to notify it in writing if his address changes and stated that the action may be dismissed if he fails to do so.

Disposition

The court ordered the issuance of summonses and delivery of the necessary service materials to the U.S. Marshals Service. It did not rule on the merits of Yeremis’s discrimination, conversion, or emotional-distress claims. The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for purposes of an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.