Matzura v. Macy's Inc.
- Andrew Carter
- 1:19-cv-09926
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Matzura v. Macy’s Inc., Judge Carter stayed the case and denied Macy’s motion to dismiss without prejudice pending related appeals.
Steven Matzura, the persons he seeks to represent, and Macy’s Inc. are affected by the stay. The case and all deadlines are paused, and Macy’s may refile its motion to dismiss after the stay is lifted.
What happened
Steven Matzura brought this case against Macy’s Inc. on behalf of himself and others similarly situated. The court received the parties’ response to its June 24, 2020 order.
The court stayed the case and all deadlines while consolidated appeals in a related case were resolved. It also denied Macy’s pending motion to dismiss without prejudice to refiling after the stay ends.
Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. ordered the parties to file a joint written report about how they want to proceed within 14 days after the appeals are resolved.
The detailed version
- Matzura v. Macy's Inc. · No. 1:19-cv-09926
- Andrew Carter
- July 15, 2020
Background
Steven Matzura sued Macy’s Inc. on behalf of himself and all other persons similarly situated. The court had previously issued an order on June 24, 2020, and received the parties’ response to that order. Macy’s had a motion to dismiss pending.
Court’s action
The court stayed the case, including all deadlines, pending resolution of consolidated appeals in Mendez v. AnnTaylor, Inc., No. 19-CV-10625. A stay pauses the case while the specified matter is pending. The court denied Macy’s motion to dismiss without prejudice to refiling after the stay is lifted. The order did not decide the underlying claims.
Next step and disposition
The parties must submit a joint written status report explaining how they want to proceed within 14 days after the consolidated appeals are resolved. Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. signed the order.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.