Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 16, 2020

Ganan Ramirez v. United States

Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Docket
1:20-cv-04009
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Ganan Ramirez v. United States, Judge Pauley ordered a pro se movant to resubmit an unsigned motion challenging his sentence with an original signature.

Who this affects

Carlos Alberto Ganan Ramirez, whose unsigned motion must be resubmitted with an original signature within 30 days.

What happened

Carlos Alberto Ganan Ramirez filed a motion challenging his federal sentence without a signature. The order identifies him as representing himself.

The court directed Ramirez to send the motion’s signature page with an original signature within 30 days. The order did not decide the claims in his motion.

Judge William H. Pauley III issued the order because court rules require an unrepresented party to personally sign written filings.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Ganan Ramirez v. United States · No. 1:20-cv-04009
Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Date
July 16, 2020

Background

Carlos Alberto Ganan Ramirez brought the matter while representing himself. The filing includes a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, a procedure for a person in federal custody to ask the sentencing court to vacate, set aside, or correct a sentence. The motion was submitted without a signature.

Court’s reasoning

The court cited Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 and Local Civil Rule 11.1(a), which require written motions and other papers to be signed by an attorney or, when a party has no lawyer, by that party personally. The court also cited a Supreme Court decision explaining that the rule requires a handwritten name or a mark placed by hand.

Ruling and effect

The court ordered Ramirez to resubmit the motion’s signature page with an original signature within 30 days of the order’s date. A copy of the signature page was attached. The order did not rule on the merits of Ramirez’s motion to challenge his sentence.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.