Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 16, 2020

Mercado v. Town of Goshen

Judge
Louis Stanton
Docket
1:20-cv-05399
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Mercado v. Town of Goshen, Judge McMahon ordered Mercado to pay fees or submit paperwork to proceed without prepayment.

Who this affects

Matthew Louis Mercado, a detained plaintiff proceeding without a lawyer, was required to pay the fees or submit the paperwork needed to request permission to proceed without prepayment.

What happened

In Mercado v. Town of Goshen, Matthew Louis Mercado, who was detained and represented himself, filed a civil action without paying the required fees or submitting the paperwork needed to request permission to proceed without prepayment.

The court gave Mercado 30 days to either pay $400 or submit a signed application and authorization allowing filing-fee payments to be deducted from his account. The court did not issue summonses at that time and warned that it would dismiss the action if he did not comply.

Judge Colleen McMahon also denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees, certifying that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Mercado v. Town of Goshen · No. 1:20-cv-05399
Judge
Louis Stanton
Date
July 16, 2020

Background

Matthew Louis Mercado filed this civil action while detained at the Orange County Correctional Facility. The opinion states that he was proceeding without a lawyer. He submitted his complaint without paying the filing fees and without a completed application to proceed without prepayment of fees or a prisoner authorization.

Fees and required paperwork

The court explained that a prisoner bringing a civil action must either pay $400 in fees—a $350 filing fee and a $50 administrative fee—or submit a signed application to proceed without prepayment of fees and a prisoner authorization. If the court grants that application, the $350 filing fee must be collected in installments from the prisoner's account. The prisoner authorization permits the facility to deduct those payments and requires certified account statements for the previous six months to be sent to the court.

Order

The court ordered Mercado, within 30 days of the order, to either pay the $400 in fees or submit the required application and prisoner authorization, labeled with docket number 20-CV-5399 (CM). The Clerk of Court was directed to mail him a copy of the order and record service on the docket. No summons was to issue at that time. The order states that the case would be processed under the Clerk's procedures if Mercado complied and that the court would dismiss the action if he did not comply within the allowed time.

The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The opinion additionally cautioned that a later dismissal for being frivolous or malicious, or for failing to state a claim, could count as a statutory “strike” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.