Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 16, 2020

Monroe v. Rockland County District Attorney's Office

Judge
Louis Stanton
Docket
1:20-cv-05445
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Monroe v. Rockland County District Attorney's Office, Judge McMahon ordered Monroe to pay fees or submit authorization to proceed.

Who this affects

Michael J. Monroe, a detained plaintiff representing himself, must either pay the required fees or submit the required prisoner authorization for his case to proceed.

What happened

In Monroe v. Rockland County District Attorney's Office, Michael J. Monroe filed a civil case without a lawyer while detained at the Rockland County Correctional Center.

Monroe asked to proceed without paying the filing fees in advance, but he did not submit the required authorization allowing installment payments from his account.

Judge McMahon ordered Monroe, within 30 days, either to pay $400 or submit the authorization; the case will be processed if he complies and dismissed if he does not.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Monroe v. Rockland County District Attorney's Office · No. 1:20-cv-05445
Judge
Louis Stanton
Date
July 16, 2020

Background

Michael J. Monroe, who was detained at the Rockland County Correctional Center, brought this civil action without a lawyer. He submitted an application to proceed without paying the filing fee in advance, but he did not submit the required prisoner authorization.

The authorization would direct the facility holding Monroe to deduct the $350 filing fee from his account in installments and send the court certified copies of his account statements for the previous six months. The opinion explains that the separate $50 administrative fee does not apply to a person granted permission to proceed without prepaying fees.

Ruling

The court ordered Monroe to do one of two things within 30 days of the order: pay $400 in fees or complete and submit the prisoner authorization labeled with docket number 20-CV-5445 (CM). The court directed the Clerk of Court to mail the order to Monroe and record service on the docket. No summons was to issue at that time.

The court stated that, if Monroe complied, the case would be processed under the Clerk's Office procedures. If he failed to comply within the allowed time, the court would dismiss the action. The court also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for an appeal. The opinion additionally cautioned that certain dismissals of prisoner cases can count as strikes under the federal prisoner-filing statute.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.