Lastra v. City Of New York
- John Koeltl
- 1:16-cv-03088
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 10
In Lastra v. City Of New York, Judge Koeltl kept the schedule unchanged, allowing objections by July 21 and responses by July 24.
James Lastra and the defendants in the case were affected by the continued schedule: Lastra could file objections by July 21, 2020, and the defendants could respond by July 24, 2020.
What happened
In Lastra v. City Of New York, James Lastra sent the court an email and documents concerning the case’s pending schedule.
The court did not change the schedule. It allowed Lastra to file objections by July 21, 2020, and allowed the defendants to respond by July 24, 2020.
Judge John G. Koeltl entered the order on July 17, 2020, stating that the schedule remained the same.
The detailed version
- Lastra v. City Of New York · No. 1:16-cv-03088
- John Koeltl
- July 17, 2020
Background The court received an email and documents from James Lastra. The attached materials included Lastra’s discussion of a pending dispute concerning a release for arrest records, an earlier discovery order, and his planned objections. The order itself does not decide those issues.
Court’s Action The court stated that the schedule remained unchanged. Lastra could file objections by July 21, 2020, and the defendants could respond by July 24, 2020.
Ruling and Effect Judge John G. Koeltl entered the order and continued the existing deadlines. The order does not state that any motion was granted or denied, and it does not resolve the parties’ underlying discovery dispute or the merits of the case.
Read the full 10-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.