Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 20, 2020

Davis v. United States

Judge
Vincent Briccetti
Docket
7:18-cv-01308
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
HabeasCriminalPro Se
In one sentence

In Davis v. United States, Judge Briccetti ordered final judgment and closed the sentence challenge after Davis was resentenced.

Who this affects

Mykai Davis, whose federal post-conviction case was closed after resentencing; the Clerk was directed to enter final judgment, update Davis’s address, and close the case.

What happened

In Davis v. United States, Mykai Davis had challenged his federal sentence without a lawyer. The court had previously ruled that his firearm conviction had to be vacated and that he had to be resentenced on the racketeering-conspiracy conviction.

Davis was resentenced, and an amended criminal judgment was entered. The July 20, 2020, order therefore directed the Clerk to enter final judgment in the related civil case and close it.

Judge Vincent L. Briccetti also ruled that Davis would not receive a certificate allowing an appeal and denied his request to proceed without paying court fees for an appeal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Davis v. United States · No. 7:18-cv-01308
Judge
Vincent Briccetti
Date
July 20, 2020

Background

Mykai Davis, proceeding without a lawyer, filed a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, which allows a federal prisoner to challenge a sentence, concerning convictions for racketeering conspiracy and using and possessing a firearm in furtherance of a crime of violence. In a July 30, 2019, Opinion and Order, the court granted in part and denied in part Davis’s motion. The court concluded that the firearm conviction had to be vacated in light of United States v. Davis and that Davis had to be resentenced on the racketeering-conspiracy count. The court denied the motion in all other respects and deferred entry of final judgment until resentencing occurred.

Action Taken in This Order

Davis was resentenced on July 10, 2020, and an amended judgment was entered in the criminal case on July 13, 2020. Because resentencing had occurred, the court ordered the Clerk to enter final judgment in the civil case according to the July 30, 2019, Opinion and Order and to close civil case number 18 CV 1308. The court also directed the Clerk to update Davis’s address on the civil docket.

Appeal-Related Rulings

Judge Vincent L. Briccetti ruled that a certificate of appealability would not issue because Davis had not made a substantial showing that a constitutional right had been denied. The court also certified that an appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and denied Davis permission to appeal without paying the filing fees. Chambers was directed to mail Davis a copy of the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.