Melendez v. Orange County Jail
- Cathy Seibel
- 7:20-cv-00113
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 4
In Melendez v. Orange County Jail, Judge Seibel ordered service on Officer Pullen and extended the service deadline after identifying the previously unnamed defendant.
Luis Melendez, Officer Andrew Pullen, the Clerk of Court, and the U.S. Marshals Service were affected by the service directions; the order did not resolve the underlying constitutional claims.
What happened
In Melendez v. Orange County Jail, Luis Melendez, who was incarcerated at Coxsackie Correctional Facility, sued under a federal civil-rights law, claiming that officials violated his constitutional rights while he was detained at the Orange County Jail.
The court had directed the Orange County Attorney to identify the unnamed Classification Sergeant. The attorney reported that Officer Andrew Pullen had classified Melendez when he entered the facility, and Melendez then filed an amended complaint naming Pullen.
Judge Cathy Seibel ordered the Clerk of Court to issue a summons and provide the necessary papers to the U.S. Marshals Service so Pullen could be served. She extended the service deadline to 90 days after the summons is issued and denied permission to appeal without paying fees.
The detailed version
- Melendez v. Orange County Jail · No. 7:20-cv-00113
- Cathy Seibel
- July 22, 2020
Background
Luis Melendez brought this lawsuit without a lawyer under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a federal law allowing claims for constitutional violations by state actors. He alleged that the defendants violated his constitutional rights while he was detained at the Orange County Jail. The opinion does not describe the specific constitutional claims.
The court had already allowed Melendez to proceed without paying the filing fee at the outset, although it noted that prisoners remain responsible for the full filing fee under the applicable statute. Because one defendant was identified only as the “Classification Sgt.,” the court directed the Orange County Attorney to determine that person’s identity and provide a service address. The attorney reported that no sergeant was assigned to oversee inmate classifications and that Officer Andrew Pullen had classified Melendez when he entered the facility on October 10, 2019. Melendez then filed an amended complaint naming Pullen.
Service of Process
Because Melendez was allowed to proceed without paying the filing fee, the court explained that he could rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the summons and complaint. The court extended the time for service until 90 days after the summons was issued.
The Clerk of Court was directed to complete a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form with Officer Pullen’s address, issue a summons, and deliver the necessary documents to the Marshals Service. The court also reminded Melendez to notify the court in writing if his address changes.
Disposition
The order directed the Clerk of Court to arrange service on Officer Pullen. It did not decide whether Melendez’s constitutional-rights allegations were valid. The court also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without paying fees for that appeal.
Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.