Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 22, 2020

Dupree v. United States of America

Judge
Alison Nathan
Docket
1:18-cv-07073
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In Dupree v. United States, Judge Nathan ordered the government to explain why it had not paid a court-approved settlement.

Who this affects

Courtney Dupree and the United States; the United States was required to explain why it had not made the settlement payment.

What happened

In Dupree v. United States of America, Courtney Dupree’s lawyer asked the court to require timely payment of a settlement resolving Dupree’s civil-rights claims.

The parties’ settlement was filed and approved by the court in May 2020, but Dupree had not received payment more than two months later. His lawyer argued that payment was already due or, at least, had to be made within a reasonable time.

Judge Alison J. Nathan ordered the government to explain within one week why it had not made the payment. The supplied opinion does not show a later ruling on whether the court ordered payment or entered judgment.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Dupree v. United States of America · No. 1:18-cv-07073
Judge
Alison Nathan
Date
July 22, 2020

Background

Counsel for Courtney Dupree wrote to the court seeking enforcement of a settlement agreement with the United States. According to the letter, the parties resolved Dupree’s civil-rights claims during summary-judgment briefing after completing fact and expert discovery. The parties filed a Stipulation and Order of Settlement and Dismissal on May 4, 2020, and the court approved it on May 8, 2020.

The letter stated that no payment had been made more than two months after the settlement was approved. It also stated that the United States had indicated payment might take another two or three weeks but could not guarantee a payment date. Dupree’s counsel argued that the settlement became effective when the court entered it and that payment was therefore due on May 8, 2020. Counsel also argued that, even without a specific deadline, the law requires payment within a reasonable time.

Requested relief

Dupree’s counsel asked the court to order payment within seven days. Counsel further requested that, if payment was not made, the court enter judgment against the United States so that post-judgment interest could begin accruing. The letter discussed payment through the federal Judgment Fund for Federal Tort Claims Act matters, but the supplied text does not state that the court adopted counsel’s legal arguments.

Court’s action

On July 22, 2020, Judge Alison J. Nathan ordered the government to show cause within one week why it had not made a payment in the matter. The supplied opinion does not show a final ruling granting or denying the request to enforce the settlement, ordering payment, or entering judgment.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.