Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Substantive rulingFiled July 24, 2020

Kiss v. Clinton Green North, LLC

Judge
Lorna Schofield
Docket
1:17-cv-10029
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
ContractSummary JudgmentCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Kiss v. Clinton Green North, LLC, Judge Schofield denied Judy Painting’s summary-judgment motion on a contractual indemnity claim without prejudice to renewal.

Who this affects

Judy Painting Corp. must continue to face Clinton Green North, LLC’s contractual indemnity claim for now, and the order leaves open the possibility of renewing the summary-judgment motion later.

What happened

In Kiss v. Clinton Green North, LLC, Judy Painting asked the court to grant summary judgment dismissing Clinton Green North’s contractual indemnity claim against it. The order states that an earlier opinion did not address this motion.

The court had also denied, without prejudice to renewal, a request by Clinton Green North and other defendants to file a summary-judgment motion on the same indemnity claim. The order does not explain the parties’ underlying dispute or the legal arguments on the claim.

Judge Lorna G. Schofield denied Judy Painting’s motion for summary judgment without prejudice to renewal at a later date.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Kiss v. Clinton Green North, LLC · No. 1:17-cv-10029
Judge
Lorna Schofield
Date
July 24, 2020

Background

The order concerns a third-party contractual indemnity claim brought by Clinton Green North, LLC against Judy Painting Corp. Contractual indemnity generally concerns one party’s alleged obligation to cover specified losses or liabilities of another party, but this order does not describe the contract’s terms.

On July 23, 2020, the Court issued an earlier opinion denying Tibor Kiss’s motion for summary judgment and granting in part and denying in part Judy Painting’s motion for summary judgment. The order states that the earlier opinion did not address Judy Painting’s motion for summary judgment seeking dismissal of Clinton Green North’s third-party contractual indemnity claim.

Other Filing

Clinton Green North, LLC, along with Clinton Green North, LLC, Dermot Clinton Green, LLC, and AvalonBay Communities, Inc., had requested permission to file a summary-judgment motion on the contractual indemnity claim. The Court denied that request without prejudice to renewal at a later time.

Ruling

Judge Lorna G. Schofield ordered that Judy Painting’s motion for summary judgment seeking dismissal of Clinton Green North, LLC’s contractual indemnity claim is DENIED without prejudice to renew at a later date. The order does not state the Court’s reasoning or decide the merits of the contractual indemnity claim.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.