Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 24, 2020

Utica Leaseco, LLC v. Spatium Enterprise LLC

Judge
Analisa Torres
Docket
1:20-cv-04933
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Preliminary InjunctionCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Utica Leaseco v. Spatium Enterprises, Judge Torres postponed the hearing and extended the temporary restraining order.

Who this affects

Utica Leaseco, LLC, Spatium Enterprises LLC d/b/a Emporio Jets, and Robert Vidal; the temporary restraining order remained in effect until August 12, 2020, at 8:30 a.m.

What happened

Utica Leaseco, LLC asked the court for an order of attachment and expedited discovery. After a defendant appeared and requested an evidentiary hearing, the court addressed the timing of that hearing and the existing temporary restraining order.

The court postponed the hearing scheduled for July 28, 2020, to August 6, 2020, at 2:00 p.m. The hearing would take place by videoconference, with the court providing instructions to the parties.

In Utica Leaseco, LLC v. Spatium Enterprises LLC doing business as Emporio Jets and Robert Vidal, Judge Analisa Torres ordered that the temporary restraining order remain in effect until August 12, 2020, at 8:30 a.m. She found good cause for the 14-day extension, but this order did not decide the underlying motion for attachment or expedited discovery.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Utica Leaseco, LLC v. Spatium Enterprise LLC · No. 1:20-cv-04933
Judge
Analisa Torres
Date
July 24, 2020

Background

Utica Leaseco, LLC moved for an order of attachment and expedited discovery. A defendant appeared and requested an evidentiary hearing. The plaintiff submitted a reply. The court had previously entered a temporary restraining order on the plaintiff's motion.

Court’s Orders

The court adjourned, meaning postponed, the show-cause hearing scheduled for July 28, 2020, to August 6, 2020, at 2:00 p.m. The hearing was to take place using the court’s videoconferencing software. The court stated that it would provide the parties with instructions for appearing by video and more detailed information about how the hearing would proceed.

The court also ordered that the temporary restraining order remain in place until August 12, 2020, at 8:30 a.m. Under Rule 65(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court found good cause to extend the order for 14 additional days. It explained that the extension would allow it to consider the record and give the parties time to prepare for the August 6 hearing, and that the extension was supported by the reasons stated in its earlier decision granting the temporary restraining order.

Disposition and Effect

Judge Analisa Torres postponed the hearing and extended the temporary restraining order through August 12, 2020, at 8:30 a.m. The opinion does not state a ruling on the merits of the requested order of attachment or expedited discovery.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.