Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 28, 2020

Beach v. JPMorgan Chase Bank

Judge
Jesse Furman
Docket
1:17-cv-00563
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureClass Action
In one sentence

In Beach v. JPMorgan Chase, Judge Furman granted an application, kept the fairness hearing scheduled, and deferred any settlement approval until October 7, 2020.

Who this affects

The parties to the proposed class-action settlement, the settlement class, and the state and federal officials entitled to receive settlement notice.

What happened

Beach v. JPMorgan Chase Bank concerns a proposed class-action settlement and notice to government officials required by federal law. An administrative error delayed notice to the attorneys general of fifteen states.

The parties jointly asked the court to hold the fairness hearing on September 22, 2020, as scheduled, but wait until at least October 7 before deciding whether to approve the settlement.

Judge Jesse Furman granted the application, kept the September 22 fairness hearing scheduled, and deferred any settlement approval until October 7, 2020. The court also directed the clerk to terminate ECF No. 216.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Beach v. JPMorgan Chase Bank · No. 1:17-cv-00563
Judge
Jesse Furman
Date
July 28, 2020

Background

The parties told the court that an administrative error delayed notice of the proposed settlement to the attorneys general of certain states. The Class Action Fairness Act, or CAFA, requires defendants in a class action to notify appropriate state and federal officials about a proposed settlement and generally bars final approval until 90 days after that notice is served.

The settlement agreement required the notices to be provided by June 1, 2020. The settlement administrator informed the defendants on June 2 that notices had been sent to all required officials. On July 9, however, the administrator discovered that notices had not been sent to the fifteen state attorneys general offices that had selected email service. The administrator promptly served those offices on July 9.

Request and Ruling

The parties jointly requested that the court hold the fairness hearing on September 22, 2020, as previously scheduled, while delaying its decision on final settlement approval until at least October 7, 2020, so the 90-day notice period could run for all states.

Judge Jesse M. Furman granted the application. The fairness hearing remained scheduled for September 22, 2020, at 3:30 p.m. The court reserved judgment on whether to grant final approval of the settlement and stated that any approval would be deferred until October 7, 2020. The clerk was directed to terminate ECF No. 216.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.