Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 30, 2020

Parker v. Colvin

Judge
Paul Gardephe
Docket
1:16-cv-00440
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Social SecurityFee Petition
In one sentence

In Parker v. Colvin, Judge Gardephe granted Donna Jean Parker’s request for $28,626.75 in attorney’s fees from her retroactive Social Security benefits.

Who this affects

Donna Jean Parker’s attorney received approval for a $28,626.75 fee award from Parker’s retroactive Social Security benefits; the Commissioner’s objection was rejected.

What happened

In Parker v. Colvin, Donna Jean Parker’s attorney asked the court to award fees under a federal law governing attorney compensation in Social Security cases. The requested amount was $28,626.75, equal to 25% of Parker’s retroactive benefits.

The Commissioner did not dispute that the fee agreement allowed counsel to seek that amount. The Commissioner objected only that the request would produce an effective hourly rate of $1,048.59 for 27.3 hours of work and would therefore give counsel an excessive payment.

Judge Gardephe granted the motion, finding that the high hourly rate reflected efficient and competent work and the risk of taking the case without guaranteed payment. The court directed the clerk to close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Parker v. Colvin · No. 1:16-cv-00440
Judge
Paul Gardephe
Date
July 30, 2020

Background

Donna Jean Parker’s counsel moved for attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1), which permits a court to award reasonable fees from past-due Social Security benefits, subject to a statutory limit of 25% of those benefits. Counsel sought $28,626.75, representing 25% of Parker’s retroactive benefits. The fee request was based on the applicable contingency-fee agreement, meaning counsel’s payment depended on obtaining benefits for Parker.

Parties’ Positions

The Commissioner did not dispute that counsel was entitled to seek $28,626.75 under the retainer agreement or that the statute permits fees up to 25% of past-due benefits. The Commissioner objected solely that the requested fee would produce an effective hourly rate of $1,048.59, calculated by dividing $28,626.75 by 27.3 hours, and would therefore be a windfall, or excessive payment, to counsel.

Court’s Analysis

The court noted that other courts in the Southern District of New York had approved Social Security fee awards producing comparable effective hourly rates. It concluded that the high rate resulted from competent and efficient advocacy rather than inadequate work. The court also considered the risk counsel accepted by taking the case on a contingency basis and the importance of encouraging attorneys to accept Social Security cases under such arrangements.

Disposition

Judge Gardephe granted the motion for attorney’s fees in the amount of $28,626.75. The clerk was directed to close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.