Allied World Surplus Lines Insurance Company v. Hoffman International, Inc.
- Philip Halpern
- 7:19-cv-06931
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Allied World v. Hoffman, Judge Halpern ordered respondents to explain why the removed action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute.
The petitioner and defendants in the removed action were affected because the respondent was required to explain the case's inactivity by August 21, 2020, or face dismissal with prejudice.
What happened
Allied World Surplus Lines Insurance Company v. Hoffman International, Inc. had been inactive after the parties told the court it was proceeding under another docket number.
The court ordered the respondent to explain in writing by August 21, 2020, why the removed action should not be dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute. The court did not dismiss the case in this order.
Judge Halpern warned that failing to respond would result in dismissal of the case under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
The detailed version
- Allied World Surplus Lines Insurance Company v. Hoffman International, Inc. · No. 7:19-cv-06931
- Philip Halpern
- Aug. 3, 2020
Background
The case is a removed subrogation action involving Allied World Surplus Lines Insurance Company, formerly known as Darwin Select Insurance Company, as subrogee of Tappan Zee Constructors, LLC, and Hoffman International, Inc., doing business as Hoffman Equipment Company, The Manitowoc Company, Inc., and Grove U.S. LLC. The opinion states that the case was reassigned to Judge Halpern on April 16, 2020.
After the reassignment, the court directed the parties to provide a status update. The parties reported that this action was proceeding under docket number 19-cv-7073, which was also later reassigned to Judge Halpern. The opinion also refers to a related action under docket number 17-cv-08874. The parties consented in the 19-cv-7073 case to proceed before Magistrate Judge McCarthy in connection with that related action. Since the parties' April 30, 2020 letter, there had been no activity on docket number 19-cv-06931.
Order to Show Cause
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) allows a district judge to dismiss a complaint for failure to prosecute, meaning failure to move the case forward. The court ordered the respondent to show cause in writing by August 21, 2020, why this removed action should not be dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute.
Disposition
The court did not dismiss the case in this order. It warned that failure to comply with the order would result in dismissal of the case. Judge Halpern signed the order on August 3, 2020.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.