Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 10, 2020

Hall v. Dept. of Corrections

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:20-cv-05695
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Hall v. Dept. of Corrections, Judge McMahon ordered Michael A. Hall to pay fees or submit the required prisoner authorization.

Who this affects

Michael A. Hall, the detained prisoner who filed the action without a lawyer, was required to pay the fees or submit the prisoner authorization.

What happened

Hall v. Dept. of Corrections concerns Michael A. Hall’s federal civil action, which he filed without a lawyer while detained. He submitted an application to proceed without paying fees upfront but did not submit the required prisoner authorization.

The court gave Hall 30 days from August 10, 2020, to either pay $400 in fees or submit the authorization. The authorization would allow filing-fee payments to be deducted from his detention account in installments. The court warned that it would dismiss the action if he did not comply.

Judge Colleen McMahon also denied permission to appeal without paying fees, stating that an appeal would not be taken in good faith. The order did not decide the merits of Hall’s claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Hall v. Dept. of Corrections · No. 1:20-cv-05695
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
Aug. 10, 2020

Background

Michael A. Hall, who was detained at the Metropolitan Detention Complex, brought the action without a lawyer. To proceed with a federal civil action, a prisoner must either pay the required fees or request permission to proceed without prepaying them. A prisoner requesting that permission must submit both a signed application and a prisoner authorization.

Hall submitted the application but not the prisoner authorization. The authorization would direct the detention facility to deduct the $350 filing fee from his account in installments and send the court certified copies of his account statements for the previous six months. The $50 administrative fee does not apply to a person granted permission to proceed without prepaying fees.

Order

The court ordered Hall, within 30 days of the order’s date, to either pay $400 in fees or complete and submit the attached prisoner authorization. The court instructed that any authorization should include docket number 20-CV-5695 (CM). The Clerk of Court was directed to mail Hall a copy of the order and record service on the docket.

The court stated that it would dismiss the action if Hall failed to comply within the allowed time. It also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The order did not address the merits of Hall’s underlying claims. It additionally cautioned that certain future dismissals could count as “strikes” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.