Stephenson v. Exclusive Motor-Sports LLC
- Philip Halpern
- 7:20-cv-01332
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 10
In Stephenson v. Exclusive Motor-Sports, Judge Halpern entered a protective order governing confidential discovery.
The parties, their representatives, agents, experts, consultants, insurers, counsel, service providers, investigators, witnesses, mediators or arbitrators, third parties providing discovery, and other people with actual or constructive notice of the order are bound by its terms when they are subject to it.
What happened
Stephenson v. Exclusive Motor-Sports LLC involved the parties’ agreement to protect nonpublic and competitively sensitive information exchanged during discovery. The parties asked the court to issue an order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and the court found good cause for a tailored order.
The order permits confidentiality designations for specified types of information, including previously undisclosed financial information, private-company ownership information, business plans, marketing plans, and personal information. It limits disclosure to listed people, requires nondisclosure agreements for certain recipients, and allows confidential material to be used only for this lawsuit and related appeals.
Judge Halpern approved the stipulated protective order on August 13, 2020. The order also explains procedures for challenging confidentiality designations, filing confidential material with the court, handling inadvertently disclosed privileged information, and returning or destroying confidential discovery material after the case ends.
The detailed version
- Stephenson v. Exclusive Motor-Sports LLC · No. 7:20-cv-01332
- Philip Halpern
- Aug. 13, 2020
Background
The parties, through counsel, stipulated to a confidentiality agreement and protective order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c). They sought protection for nonpublic and competitively sensitive information that might be disclosed during discovery. The court found good cause for an appropriately tailored order governing the pretrial phase of the action.
Confidentiality designations and permitted disclosures
The order defines “Discovery Material” as information of any kind produced or disclosed during discovery. A producing party may designate material as “Confidential” only when it reasonably and in good faith believes the material includes specified categories, such as previously undisclosed financial information; previously undisclosed information about ownership or control of a nonpublic company; business, product-development, or marketing plans; personal or intimate information; or another category later given confidential status by the court.
The producing party or its counsel must mark protected portions of discovery material and produce a redacted copy for future public use. Deposition exhibits and transcript portions may be designated during the deposition or within 30 days afterward; during that 30-day period, the entire deposition transcript is treated as confidential.
Confidential material may be disclosed only to categories listed in the order, including the parties, their insurers, litigation counsel and staff, outside vendors, investigators, mediators or arbitrators, certain people identified in documents, potential witnesses, experts and other specialized advisers, deposition transcription providers, and the court. Before disclosure to certain recipients, including investigators, mediators, potential witnesses, and experts, counsel must provide the order and obtain a signed nondisclosure agreement.
Court filings and challenges
The order does not waive objections to discovery, privileges, or protections, and it does not decide whether evidence will be admissible at trial. A party filing confidential material must publicly file a redacted version and file the unredacted version under seal. The court retains discretion over whether to keep material confidential when it is submitted in connection with a motion or other proceeding, and the order states that material introduced at trial is unlikely to remain sealed.
A party may object to a confidentiality designation or request additional disclosure limits, such as “attorneys’ eyes only,” before trial. If the parties cannot promptly resolve the dispute, counsel must bring it to the court under the court’s individual practices.
Privileged information and end of the case
An inadvertent disclosure of material protected by attorney-client privilege or the attorney-work-product protection does not waive that protection under the order. After notice, the receiving party generally must return or destroy the material within five business days, and the producing party must then provide a privilege log. The receiving party may ask the court to compel production, while the producing party retains the burden of establishing the material’s privileged or protected status.
Within 60 days after final disposition of the action, including appeals, recipients must return or destroy confidential discovery material and certify that they have not kept copies or other reproductions. Counsel specifically retained for the action may keep an archival copy of specified case materials, but those copies remain subject to the order. The order survives termination of the litigation, and the court retains jurisdiction to enforce it or impose contempt sanctions.
Disposition
Judge Philip M. Halpern entered the stipulated confidentiality and protective order. This order addressed discovery confidentiality and related procedures; the provided text does not decide the underlying claims or defenses.
Read the full 10-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.