Ace American Insurance Company v. Frey, Jr.
- Vyskocil
- 1:17-cv-06810
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 3
In Ace American v. Frye, Judge Vyskocil approved a $225,000 settlement for Daniela Abreu’s estate and set fees and costs.
The Estate of Daniela Abreu, Teresa Henriquez as its administratrix, Ace American Insurance Company, the other defendants, and the attorneys receiving the approved fees and costs.
What happened
In Ace American Insurance Company v. Sewell L. “Hunter” Frye, Jr., Teresa Henriquez, acting for the Estate of Daniela Abreu, asked the court to approve a settlement with Ace American Insurance Company. No party opposed the request.
The court reviewed the settlement release and supporting documents and found the settlement fair, reasonable, and in the estate’s best interests. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement’s complete terms.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil approved the settlement, authorized Henriquez to sign necessary documents, and set the settlement amount at $225,000. The court also approved $75,000 in attorney’s fees and $10,221.05 in costs, and discontinued the action without prejudice to restoring it by September 14, 2020; otherwise, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
The detailed version
- Ace American Insurance Company v. Frey, Jr. · No. 1:17-cv-06810
- Vyskocil
- Aug. 13, 2020
Background
Teresa Henriquez, as administratrix of the Estate of Daniela Abreu, moved under Southern District of New York Local Civil Rule 83.2 for approval of a settlement between the estate and Ace American Insurance Company. The motion was unopposed. The opinion states that the settlement’s complete terms were in a release attached to the supporting papers, but it does not describe the underlying dispute or those complete terms.
Court’s findings and ruling
After reviewing the release, motion, and supporting declarations, the court found that the settlement was fair, reasonable, in Daniela Abreu’s and her estate’s best interests, and compliant with Local Civil Rule 83.2(b). The court therefore approved the settlement.
The court authorized Henriquez to sign documents needed to complete the settlement on behalf of Abreu. It also designated Henriquez as guardian of Abreu’s property for receiving settlement funds under New York Civil Practice Law and Rules § 1206. The settlement amount was $225,000, to be distributed according to the release.
The court set attorney’s fees at $75,000, stating that this did not exceed 33.33% of the settlement amount. It approved $10,221.05 in litigation costs and expenses as fair, reasonable, and necessary, and ordered that the fees and costs be paid to Held & Hines, LLP from the settlement amount. The court also ordered the defendants to remain responsible for liens and reimbursement claims identified in the release, including claims by Medicaid, Medicare, or health-care providers.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ordered that the action be discontinued without prejudice to restoring it to the court’s calendar if an application was made by September 14, 2020. The order stated that if no application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.