Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 21, 2020

Kang v. Chase

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:20-cv-06656
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Kang v. Chase, Judge McMahon ordered Kai Kang to pay filing fees or submit a fuller fee-waiver application within 30 days.

Who this affects

Kai Kang must either pay the $400 filing fees or submit a complete amended application within 30 days; otherwise, the action will be dismissed.

What happened

In Kang v. Chase, Kai Kang filed the action without a lawyer and asked to proceed without paying filing fees in advance. His application reported no income, resources, expenses, or debts, and said only “Non-resident” when asked how he supported himself.

The court said this information did not show that Kang was unable to pay. It ordered him, within 30 days, either to pay $400 in filing fees or submit an amended application fully explaining his financial situation. No summons would issue at that time, and the court warned that it would dismiss the action if he did not comply.

Judge Colleen McMahon also denied fee-free status for any appeal, finding that an appeal would not be taken in good faith. The order did not address the underlying claims against Chase.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Kang v. Chase · No. 1:20-cv-06656
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
Aug. 21, 2020

Background

Kai Kang brought this action pro se, meaning without a lawyer, and requested permission to proceed without prepaying the filing fees. The court explained that starting a civil action required either paying $400—the $350 filing fee plus the $50 administrative fee—or submitting an application for permission to proceed without prepayment under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914 and 1915.

Kang submitted an application, but the court found that his answers did not establish that he could not afford the fees. The application stated that he had no sources of income, resources, expenses, or debts. In response to the question asking how he supported himself, Kang wrote only “Non-resident.” The court therefore could not determine whether he had sufficient funds to pay.

Order

The court ordered Kang, within 30 days of the order, to do one of two things: pay the $400 in fees or complete and submit the attached amended application. The amended application had to fully answer the questions, explain how he supported himself, and provide facts showing that he was unable to pay. It also had to identify docket number 1:20-CV-6656 (CM).

The court stated that if it granted the amended application, Kang could proceed without prepaying fees. If it found that he had funds to pay, it could require payment. No summons would issue at that time. If Kang complied, the Clerk’s Office would process the action under its procedures; if he failed to comply within the allowed time, the court would dismiss the action.

Appeal and Disposition

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for an appeal. Judge Colleen McMahon issued the order directing payment of fees or submission of an amended application. The order addressed filing-fee requirements and did not decide the merits of Kang’s claims against Chase.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.