Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 25, 2020

Christenson v. Kennedy

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:20-cv-06730
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Christenson v. Kennedy, Judge McMahon dismissed the action without prejudice for violating a prior filing restriction and denied fee-free appeal status.

Who this affects

Mark C. Christenson's new action was dismissed without prejudice, and he was denied permission to appeal without paying filing fees. John Kennedy is the named defendant, but the order does not describe any specific effect on him.

What happened

In Christenson v. Kennedy, Mark C. Christenson filed a new case without paying the filing fee or asking for permission to proceed without paying it. The court assumed he wanted to proceed without paying the fee. A prior order had required him to obtain permission before filing any new case without paying the fee.

Because Christenson did not seek that permission, the court dismissed the action without prejudice for failing to follow the earlier order. The opinion does not address the underlying claims against John Kennedy.

Judge Colleen McMahon ordered the dismissal and directed the Clerk of Court to mail the order to Christenson. She also ruled that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied Christenson permission to appeal without paying the required fees.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Christenson v. Kennedy · No. 1:20-cv-06730
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
Aug. 25, 2020

Background

Mark C. Christenson filed this new case without paying the filing fees or requesting permission to proceed without paying them. The court treated the filing as an application to proceed without paying the fees. The opinion states that an earlier order had barred Christenson from filing any new action without paying fees unless he first obtained permission from the court. Christenson did not seek that permission.

Ruling

The court dismissed the action without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1651 because Christenson failed to comply with the earlier order. “Without prejudice” means the dismissal itself does not bar a later filing, although the opinion does not describe what requirements would apply to any later filing. The order does not decide the underlying claims against John Kennedy.

Appeal and service

The court directed the Clerk of Court to mail a copy of the order to Christenson and record service on the docket. The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without paying the filing fees.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.