Kim v. Choi
- Ona Wang
- 1:19-cv-08911
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 14
In Kim v. Choi, Judge Wang granted plaintiffs’ request for a one-week extension to address bankruptcy’s possible effect on FLSA settlement approval.
The order affected plaintiffs Sara Kim and Angelo Duva and defendants Stephen Choi, Christine Tripi, and St. Vince Group, LLC, by extending the settlement-approval deadline.
What happened
In Kim v. Choi, Sara Kim and Angelo Duva asked for more time to submit an application for court approval of their settlement of federal wage claims. The request followed Christine Tripi’s Chapter 7 bankruptcy filing and the resulting concern about the bankruptcy law’s automatic stay.
The requested extension would move the deadline from August 26 to September 2, 2020. The parties had agreed to settle the Fair Labor Standards Act claims and pursue their state-law claims in state court. The defendants did not oppose the extension.
Judge Ona T. Wang granted the application and stated that an earlier filing, identified as ECF 43, was denied as moot. The order did not decide whether the automatic stay prevented the planned settlement-related dismissal.
The detailed version
- Kim v. Choi · No. 1:19-cv-08911
- Ona Wang
- Aug. 27, 2020
Background
Plaintiffs Sara Kim and Angelo Duva sued Stephen Choi, Christine Tripi, and St. Vince Group, LLC, doing business as East Village Tavern and DayTripper. The settlement documents state that the lawsuit included claims under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), including minimum-wage claims, as well as state-law claims.
The parties reached an agreement in principle during a July 15, 2020 mediation. Their proposed settlement would resolve the FLSA claims through a settlement subject to court review under the Second Circuit’s settlement-approval requirement, while allowing the plaintiffs’ state-law claims to proceed in state court. The proposed dismissal stated that the case would be dismissed with prejudice only as to the FLSA claims, while the settlement would not bar the unreleased state-law claims.
Request for an Extension
The plaintiffs’ counsel reported that Tripi filed a Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition on August 6, 2020. Plaintiffs later received notice of the bankruptcy filing and asked for a one-week extension of the deadline for filing the settlement-approval application. They wanted additional time to determine whether the Bankruptcy Code’s automatic stay affected the planned settlement and dismissal. The proposed new deadline was September 2, 2020. The defendants did not oppose the request.
The letter also stated that the settlement agreement had been fully executed. It described a proposed confession of judgment under which Choi would acknowledge the LLC’s liability to the plaintiffs in the amount of $11,000, followed by a stipulated dismissal.
Ruling
Judge Ona T. Wang granted the application. The endorsement also stated that ECF 43 was denied as moot. The order did not resolve whether the bankruptcy automatic stay barred the proposed dismissal, and it did not independently decide the merits of the plaintiffs’ FLSA or state-law claims.
Read the full 14-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.