Yugsi Morocho v. VIP Nail Salon Inc.
- Sarah Cave
- 1:19-cv-05546
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Yugsi Morocho v. VIP Nail Salon, Judge Cave found the amended Fair Labor Standards Act settlement fair and reasonable after correcting its release and payee provisions.
Blanca Etelbia Yugsi Morocho and the defendants—VIP Nail Salon Inc. d/b/a “VIP Nails,” Joo In Oh, Hye Sook Oh, and Jane Doe—were affected by the court’s review of their amended FLSA settlement.
What happened
Yugsi Morocho v. VIP Nail Salon Inc. is a wage-and-hour case under the Fair Labor Standards Act, a federal law governing certain employee pay and working conditions. The parties asked the court to review their proposed settlement.
The court had previously declined to approve the agreement because it contained an overly broad release and incorrectly identified the payee for part of the settlement. The amended agreement corrected both issues and included a limited mutual release.
Judge Sarah L. Cave found that the amended agreement, including its provisions for attorneys’ fees and costs, appeared fair and reasonable. The opinion does not state a separate express approval sentence after that finding.
The detailed version
- Yugsi Morocho v. VIP Nail Salon Inc. · No. 1:19-cv-05546
- Sarah Cave
- Aug. 28, 2020
Background
Blanca Etelbia Yugsi Morocho brought this wage-and-hour case under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) against VIP Nail Salon Inc. doing business as “VIP Nails,” Joo In Oh, also known as “Domina,” Hye Sook Oh, and Jane Doe, also known as “Clara.” The parties consented to Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave’s jurisdiction to review their proposed settlement.
Earlier Settlement Review
On August 8, 2020, the court denied approval of the original settlement agreement because it contained an overly broad release and a typographical error concerning the payee of part of the settlement amount. The court found that the agreement was fair and reasonable apart from those two provisions.
Amended Agreement
The parties submitted an amended agreement correcting the release and payee provisions. The amended agreement contained a more limited mutual release and corrected the payee information. The court reviewed the amended agreement under Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., which governs judicial review of FLSA settlements in the Second Circuit.
Ruling
The court stated that FLSA settlements are generally subject to a strong presumption of fairness and considered financial difficulties that some defendants might face if the settlement were not completed. Judge Sarah L. Cave found that the terms of the amended agreement, including the allocation of attorneys’ fees and costs, appeared fair and reasonable. The opinion text does not separately state in express terms that the amended agreement was approved after making that finding.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.