Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 9, 2020

Vargas v. Banc of America Leasing & Capital, LLC

Judge
Lewis Kaplan
Docket
1:20-cv-07163
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Vargas v. Banc of America Leasing, Judge Kaplan ordered an amended removal notice by September 18 or remand for inadequate jurisdiction allegations.

Who this affects

The parties to the removed action, because the case would be remanded if an adequate amended notice of removal was not filed by September 18, 2020.

What happened

Vargas v. Banc of America Leasing & Capital LLC concerns a case removed to federal court under diversity jurisdiction and the federal removal statute.

The court found that the notice of removal did not adequately allege facts showing federal subject-matter jurisdiction, including the citizenship of certain people or business entities.

Judge Lewis A. Kaplan ordered that an amended notice adequately alleging jurisdiction be filed by September 18, 2020; otherwise, the action would be remanded.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Vargas v. Banc of America Leasing & Capital, LLC · No. 1:20-cv-07163
Judge
Lewis Kaplan
Date
Sept. 9, 2020

Background

The action was removed to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The order states that jurisdiction was invoked under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332 and 1441. Section 1332 concerns federal diversity jurisdiction, and Section 1441 concerns removal of an action from state court to federal court.

Jurisdictional Deficiency

The court found that the notice of removal did not adequately allege the existence of subject-matter jurisdiction. The order identifies possible deficiencies involving the citizenship of one or more natural persons, corporations, partnerships, or limited liability companies, as well as the nature and citizenship of business entities. It also lists the timely removal of the action from state court as a possible issue. The text does not clearly identify which of these listed issues were the actual deficiencies.

Order

The court did not decide the underlying dispute. It directed that an amended notice of removal adequately alleging subject-matter jurisdiction be filed by September 18, 2020. The order states that, absent that filing, the action would be remanded. The order was signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.