Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 10, 2020

Thomas-Leslie v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.

Judge
Analisa Torres
Docket
1:20-cv-05447
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Thomas-Leslie v. Dollar Tree, Judge Torres remanded the case because the complaint failed to allege complete diversity for federal jurisdiction.

Who this affects

Debra Thomas-Leslie and the named defendants, because the action was returned to Supreme Court, Bronx County and the federal case was closed.

What happened

In Thomas-Leslie v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc., Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. moved the case from Bronx County Supreme Court to federal court, citing diversity jurisdiction.

The federal court found that the amended complaint did not allege complete diversity among the parties. Without complete diversity, the court lacked the stated basis for federal jurisdiction.

Judge Analisa Torres ordered the case remanded to Bronx County Supreme Court and directed the Clerk to close the federal case. The order did not decide the underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Thomas-Leslie v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. · No. 1:20-cv-05447
Judge
Analisa Torres
Date
Sept. 10, 2020

Background

Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. removed the action from Supreme Court, Bronx County, to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York under the federal diversity-jurisdiction statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). The caption names Debra Thomas-Leslie as plaintiff and Dollar Tree Stores, Inc., Dollar Tree Store #4169, Expert Janitorial d/b/a National Janitorial Solutions, and One-A Cleaning & Maintenance as defendants.

Jurisdictional issue

Diversity jurisdiction generally requires the case to be between citizens of different states or between a state citizen and a citizen or subject of a foreign country. The court explained that one plaintiff sharing a state of citizenship with one defendant defeats diversity jurisdiction over the entire action. The amended complaint did not allege complete diversity among the parties and therefore did not provide the required short and plain statement of the grounds for federal jurisdiction under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)(1).

Disposition

The court ordered that the action be remanded to Supreme Court, Bronx County. It directed the Clerk of Court to carry out the remand and close the federal case. The order resolved the federal court’s jurisdictional issue and did not decide the underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.