Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 16, 2020

Onatolu v. Bloomberg

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:20-cv-07570
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Onatolu v. Bloomberg, Judge McMahon dismissed the case without prejudice because Onatolu filed without required court permission.

Who this affects

Adekunle A. Onatolu, who filed the case without a lawyer and sought to proceed without paying filing fees.

What happened

In Adekunle A. Onatolu v. Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg, Onatolu filed a new case without a lawyer and asked to proceed without paying filing fees.

A 2015 court order had barred Onatolu from filing any new fee-free case unless he first obtained the court’s permission. He had not requested that permission before filing this case.

Chief Judge Colleen McMahon dismissed the case without prejudice for violating the 2015 order. She also denied fee-free status for any appeal and certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Onatolu v. Bloomberg · No. 1:20-cv-07570
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
Sept. 16, 2020

Background

Adekunle A. Onatolu filed this case without a lawyer and sought permission to proceed without paying filing fees, known as in forma pauperis (IFP) status. A July 9, 2015 order had barred him from filing any new IFP action unless he first obtained the court’s permission to file. The opinion states that Onatolu had not sought that permission before filing this action.

Ruling

The court dismissed the action without prejudice because Onatolu failed to comply with the July 9, 2015 order. The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied IFP status for an appeal. The court did not address the notice of appeal, motion to extend the time to appeal, or motion to proceed IFP on appeal that Onatolu attached to his complaint, because there was no order in this action to appeal when he filed the complaint.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.