Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 21, 2020

Trustees of the Drywall Tapers and Pointers Local Union No. 1974 Benefit Funds…

Full caption

Trustees of the Drywall Tapers and Pointers Local Union No. 1974 Benefit Funds v. Excellence Drywall, LLC

Judge
Lorna Schofield
Docket
1:19-cv-07273
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Fee PetitionCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Trustees of the Drywall Tapers v. Excellence Drywall, Judge Schofield awarded $3,854 in fees and costs, plus post-judgment interest, after a default judgment.

Who this affects

The plaintiffs, Trustees of the Drywall Tapers and Pointers Local Union No. 1974 Benefit Funds and the other plaintiffs identified in the case, received $3,854 in attorneys’ fees and costs plus post-judgment interest. Excellence Drywall, LLC was ordered to pay those amounts.

What happened

Trustees of the Drywall Tapers and Pointers Local Union No. 1974 Benefit Funds and other plaintiffs had already obtained a default judgment against Excellence Drywall, LLC. The court reserved the amounts of liquidated damages, attorneys’ fees, and costs for a later review.

Magistrate Judge Kevin Fox recommended awarding the plaintiffs $3,225 in reasonable attorneys’ fees and $629 in costs and disbursements, for a total of $3,854. The defendant was mailed the recommendation, but no timely objections were filed.

Judge Lorna G. Schofield found no clear error, adopted the recommendation as modified, and awarded the plaintiffs $3,854 plus post-judgment interest at the statutory rate. The clerk was asked to close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Trustees of the Drywall Tapers and Pointers Local Union No. 1974 Benefit Funds… · No. 1:19-cv-07273
Judge
Lorna Schofield
Date
Sept. 21, 2020

Background

A November 26, 2019 default judgment had awarded judgment to the plaintiffs against Excellence Drywall, LLC, with the amounts of liquidated damages, attorneys’ fees, court costs, and disbursements to be determined through a later review of evidence. The plaintiffs were directed to provide evidentiary support for the attorneys’ fees and costs they sought.

Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation

On August 14, 2020, Magistrate Judge Kevin Fox issued a Report and Recommendation. It recommended an award of $3,854, consisting of $3,225 in reasonable attorneys’ fees and $629 in costs and disbursements. The plaintiffs mailed a copy of the recommendation to the defendant on September 1, 2020. No timely objections were filed.

Because there were no timely objections, Judge Schofield reviewed the recommendation for clear error on the face of the record. The court found no clear error regarding the recommended attorneys’ fees, costs, and disbursements.

Ruling

Judge Lorna G. Schofield ordered that the Report and Recommendation be adopted as modified. The plaintiffs were awarded $3,854—$3,225 in reasonable attorneys’ fees and $629 in costs and disbursements—plus post-judgment interest calculated at the statutory rate under 28 U.S.C. § 1961. The opinion states that this interest was awarded even though it had not been explicitly requested. The clerk was asked to close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.