Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 23, 2020

Zhu v. A Plus Kitchen Inc.

Judge
Vernon Broderick
Docket
1:16-cv-05767
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
FlsaEmploymentFee PetitionCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Zhu v. A Plus Kitchen, Judge Broderick granted default judgment, awarding plaintiffs $110,235.78 in damages, fees, and costs.

Who this affects

Guang Ping Zhu and Chi How Cheung received the ordered damages, attorney’s fees, and costs; A Plus Kitchen, Inc. and Zheng Cun Zheng were subject to the default judgment.

What happened

Zhu and Cheung sued A Plus Kitchen, Inc., Zheng Cun Zheng, and others under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The named defendants later indicated they intended to default and did not appear at the hearing on the proposed default judgment.

A magistrate judge recommended awarding Zhu $67,346.62, Cheung $42,889.16, $20,197.50 in attorney’s fees, and $1,114.40 in costs. Neither side objected to that recommendation.

Judge Vernon S. Broderick reviewed the recommendation for clear error, found none, adopted it in full, and granted the plaintiffs’ application for default judgment. The court directed entry of judgment and closed the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Zhu v. A Plus Kitchen Inc. · No. 1:16-cv-05767
Judge
Vernon Broderick
Date
Sept. 23, 2020

Background

Guang Ping Zhu and Chi How Cheung brought this action under the Fair Labor Standards Act against A Plus Kitchen, Inc., Zheng Cun Zheng, and other defendants identified as John Does. The named defendants answered the original complaint. After the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint, the named defendants stipulated that they were liable on certain counts. Their counsel later withdrew, and the plaintiffs reported that the named defendants intended to default.

The plaintiffs obtained a Clerk’s Certificate of Default and sought a default judgment. The named defendants did not appear at the December 7, 2018 show-cause hearing. On December 9, 2018, the court entered their default and referred the case to Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox to determine damages.

Report and Recommendation

The plaintiffs submitted proposed factual findings, legal conclusions, declarations, exhibits, and a legal memorandum. Magistrate Judge Fox recommended awards of $67,346.62 to Zhu, $42,889.16 to Cheung, $20,197.50 in attorney’s fees, and $1,114.40 in costs. Neither the plaintiffs nor the defendants objected.

When no party objects to a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, the district court reviews it for clear error. Judge Vernon S. Broderick reviewed Magistrate Judge Fox’s report under that standard and found no clear error.

Ruling

Judge Broderick adopted the Report and Recommendation in its entirety and granted the plaintiffs’ application for a default judgment. The court awarded Zhu $67,346.62 and Cheung $42,889.16. It also awarded the plaintiffs $20,197.50 in attorney’s fees and $1,114.40 in costs.

The Clerk’s Office was directed to terminate any open motions, enter judgment consistent with the order, and close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.