Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 29, 2020

Bisnow LLC v. Lopez-Pierre

Judge
Sarah Cave
Docket
1:20-cv-03441-PAE-SLC
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedureFee Petition
In one sentence

In Bisnow LLC v. Lopez-Pierre, Judge Cave set deadlines for written submissions on damages and attorneys’ fees and warned a hearing might be omitted.

Who this affects

Bisnow LLC must submit evidence and serve the order; Thomas Lopez-Pierre may respond or request an in-court hearing by the stated deadline.

What happened

Bisnow LLC v. Lopez-Pierre concerns the process for deciding damages and attorneys’ fees after the matter was referred for an inquest and recommendation.

The court ordered Bisnow LLC to submit proposed findings, legal conclusions, and supporting evidence by October 29, 2020. Thomas Lopez-Pierre could respond by November 12, 2020, but the court warned that it might recommend damages based only on Bisnow’s written submissions if he did not respond or request a hearing.

Judge Sarah L. Cave also ordered Bisnow to serve the scheduling order on Lopez-Pierre and file proof of service by October 29, 2020. The order did not determine the amount of damages or fees.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Bisnow LLC v. Lopez-Pierre · No. 1:20-cv-03441-PAE-SLC
Judge
Sarah Cave
Date
Sept. 29, 2020

Background

The matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave to conduct an inquest—a proceeding to gather information and make findings—and to report and recommend concerning Bisnow LLC’s damages and attorneys’ fees. The order does not state the amount of damages or fees sought, or make a final award.

Order

The court ordered Bisnow LLC to submit proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law concerning damages by October 29, 2020. The submission had to support factual assertions with affidavits or other evidence. Bisnow’s request for attorneys’ fees and costs also had to be presented in the provided format, with evidentiary support.

Thomas Lopez-Pierre was allowed to respond by November 12, 2020. The order stated that if he did not respond or contact Judge Cave’s chambers by that date to request an in-court hearing, Judge Cave intended to issue a report and recommendation concerning damages based only on Bisnow’s written submissions, without an in-court hearing.

Bisnow was also directed to serve the order on Lopez-Pierre and file proof of service by October 29, 2020.

Disposition and Effect

This is a scheduling order governing the damages-and-fees process. It did not decide the amount of damages, attorneys’ fees, or costs. Judge Cave issued deadlines and described the possible procedure if Lopez-Pierre did not respond or request a hearing.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.