Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Substantive rulingFiled Sept. 30, 2020

Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund v…

Full caption

Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund v. H.R.A.D. Construction Corp.

Judge
Edgardo Ramos
Docket
1:19-cv-01274
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
ArbitrationSummary JudgmentContract
In one sentence

Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters v. H.R.A.D. Construction, Judge Ramos granted summary judgment, confirmed the arbitration award, and entered judgment for petitioners.

Who this affects

The petitioners received confirmation of the arbitration award and a judgment against H.R.A.D. Construction Corp. for the award amount, interest, costs, attorneys’ fees, and post-judgment interest. H.R.A.D. Construction Corp. is the respondent against whom judgment was entered.

What happened

In Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters v. H.R.A.D. Construction Corp., the petitioners asked the court to confirm a November 2018 arbitration award against H.R.A.D. Construction Corp., which had not appeared in the case.

The court found no genuine dispute about any important fact and determined that the arbitration award had a legally supportable basis. It confirmed an award of $3,857.95, plus interest at 7% annually from the award date through judgment, and awarded $70 in costs, $607 in attorneys’ fees, and post-judgment interest at the statutory rate.

Judge Edgardo Ramos granted the motion, confirmed the arbitration award, entered judgment for the petitioners against H.R.A.D. Construction Corp., and directed the Clerk of Court to close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund v… · No. 1:19-cv-01274
Judge
Edgardo Ramos
Date
Sept. 30, 2020

Background

The petitioners filed the action to confirm a November 2018 arbitration award against H.R.A.D. Construction Corp. H.R.A.D. did not appear. On March 29, 2019, the court treated the petition as an unopposed motion for summary judgment, which is a request for judgment without a trial when there is no genuine dispute over an important fact.

Court’s analysis

The court explained that confirming an arbitration award is ordinarily a streamlined proceeding that turns the award into a court judgment. Judicial review of an arbitration award is narrow, and the court generally must confirm the award unless a legal basis exists to vacate, modify, or correct it. An unanswered petition to confirm an arbitration award is treated as an unopposed summary-judgment motion.

After reviewing the petitioners’ submissions, the court found no disputed material fact and concluded that the arbitration award had at least a minimally supportable justification. The court therefore confirmed the award of $3,857.95, with prejudgment interest from the date of the award through the date of judgment at 7% annually. The court also found the petitioners’ request for $677 in attorneys’ fees and costs reasonable and supported by the parties’ collective bargaining agreement.

Ruling

Judge Edgardo Ramos granted the motion to confirm the petition and confirmed the underlying arbitration award. The judgment awarded the petitioners: (1) $3,857.95 under the November 15, 2018 arbitration award, plus 7% annual interest through the date of judgment; (2) $70 in costs; (3) $607 in attorneys’ fees; and (4) post-judgment interest at the statutory rate. The court directed the Clerk of Court to enter judgment and close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.