Nisbett v. Buffy Inc.
- Jesse Furman
- 1:20-cv-02981
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Nisbett v. Buffy Inc., Judge Furman scheduled default-judgment briefing and a show-cause hearing after Buffy failed to appear.
Nisbett and Buffy Inc.; the order primarily set deadlines and procedures for a possible default-judgment motion and hearing.
What happened
In Nisbett v. Buffy Inc., Nisbett filed a complaint, and Buffy was served on July 29, 2020. The opinion states that Buffy had not answered the complaint or otherwise appeared by October 1, 2020.
The court set December 3, 2020, as the deadline for any motion for default judgment and December 10, 2020, as the deadline for Buffy’s opposition. The court also ordered Buffy to appear on December 15, 2020, and explain why default judgment should not be entered if a motion was filed.
Judge Furman did not enter default judgment in this order. He also ordered service of the order and any motion papers on Buffy, provided procedures if Buffy appeared, and adjourned the previously scheduled initial pretrial conference indefinitely.
The detailed version
- Nisbett v. Buffy Inc. · No. 1:20-cv-02981
- Jesse Furman
- Oct. 1, 2020
Background
Nisbett filed the complaint on April 12, 2020. Buffy was served on July 29, 2020, and proof of service was filed with the court. The court stated that Buffy had not answered the complaint or otherwise appeared in the action.
Court’s Orders
The court ordered that any motion for default judgment be filed by December 3, 2020, under the court’s individual rules. Buffy was given until December 10, 2020, to oppose that motion. The court cautioned that a corporation may appear in federal court only through licensed counsel and that repeated failure to appear through counsel may lead to entry of default judgment.
If a motion for default judgment was filed, the court ordered Buffy to appear at a December 15, 2020, hearing and show cause—that is, explain—why default judgment should not be entered. Nisbett was required to file a proposed default judgment order for the Clerk’s approval before the hearing.
If Buffy appeared, opposed the motion, or requested an extension of time to respond to the complaint, the court directed the parties to treat the hearing as the initial pretrial conference and follow specified procedures, including submitting a joint letter and proposed case-management plan and participating in early mediation.
The court also ordered Nisbett to serve Buffy with the order within one business day and to serve any default-judgment motion and supporting papers within one business day after filing. Nisbett had to file proof of each service on the docket within two business days.
Disposition
The order scheduled briefing and a possible show-cause hearing; it did not grant or deny default judgment. The court adjourned the initial pretrial conference previously set for October 6, 2020, indefinitely and directed the Clerk to terminate ECF No. 14.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.