Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Substantive rulingFiled Oct. 2, 2020

Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund v…

Full caption

Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund v. TWI Construction Corp.

Judge
Paul Gardephe
Docket
1:20-cv-04870
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
9
ArbitrationContractEmployment
In one sentence

Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund v. TWI Construction Corp.: Judge Gardephe confirmed the arbitration award.

Who this affects

The petitioners’ labor-management funds, charitable fund, contractor alliance, and Union obtained a judgment against TWI Construction Corp. for the confirmed arbitration award, court-related attorneys’ fees and costs, and interest.

What happened

In Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund v. TWI Construction Corp., the petitioners asked the court to confirm an arbitration award against TWI under collective bargaining agreements. TWI did not oppose the petition or appear in the case.

The arbitrator found that TWI failed to permit an audit and owed $682,005.74, including unpaid contributions, interest, liquidated damages, costs, attorneys’ fees, and the arbitrator’s fee. The petitioners also requested fees and costs for the court case and post-judgment interest.

Judge Gardephe granted the petition, confirmed the $682,005.74 award, awarded $2,232.50 in attorneys’ fees and $70 in costs, and ordered interest before and after judgment as described in the order. The case was closed.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund v… · No. 1:20-cv-04870
Judge
Paul Gardephe
Date
Oct. 2, 2020

Background

The petitioners were trustees of labor-management and charitable funds, a contractor alliance, and a labor organization. TWI Construction Corp. was bound by collective bargaining agreements with the Union. Those agreements required TWI to make contributions to the Funds for covered work and to provide books and records for audits.

The Funds determined that TWI had failed to provide records for an audit and had not made required contributions for the period from April 1, 2016, through May 13, 2020. The agreements required disputes about payments to the Funds to be arbitrated and allowed the arbitrator to award damages. They also allowed recovery of unpaid contributions, interest, liquidated damages, costs, and attorneys’ fees.

The petitioners initiated arbitration on April 17, 2020. TWI did not appear at the May 13, 2020 hearing. Based on the evidence presented, the arbitrator found TWI in violation of the agreements and awarded $682,005.74: $486,011.13 in delinquent contributions, $96,392.38 in interest, $97,202.23 in liquidated damages, $400 in costs, $1,500 in attorneys’ fees, and $500 for the arbitrator’s fee. Interest was to accrue at 6.75% from May 15, 2020.

Court’s analysis

The court explained that confirmation of an arbitration award is a limited proceeding that turns the award into a court judgment. Even when a petition is unopposed, the court must examine the petitioners’ submissions to determine whether they showed that no material factual dispute prevented judgment.

The court found that the arbitrator considered the hearing evidence, applied the relevant collective bargaining provisions, and acted within the authority granted by those agreements. The court found no evidence that the award was unlawful, arbitrary, or beyond the arbitrator’s powers. It also noted that courts generally may not review an arbitrator’s decision on the merits.

Ruling

Judge Paul G. Gardephe granted the unopposed petition to confirm all aspects of the arbitration award. The Clerk was directed to enter judgment for $682,005.74, with 6.75% interest from May 15, 2020, until entry of judgment. The court also granted the petitioners’ request for $2,232.50 in attorneys’ fees and $70 in costs for the court action. Post-judgment interest was ordered at the statutory federal rate from the date of judgment, and the Clerk was directed to close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 9-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.