Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 5, 2020

Komatsu v. The City of New York

Judge
Edgardo Ramos
Docket
1:20-cv-07046
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

Komatsu v. City of New York: Judge Ramos denied Komatsu’s request to terminate Magistrate Judge Gorenstein’s designation based on dissatisfaction with prior actions.

Who this affects

Towaki Komatsu’s request to terminate Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein’s designation was denied; the underlying claims against The City of New York and the other defendants were not decided in this order.

What happened

In Komatsu v. The City of New York, Towaki Komatsu asked the court to terminate Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein’s designation in the case.

Komatsu based the request on actions Judge Gorenstein had taken in a prior related proceeding. The opinion does not describe those actions in detail.

Judge Edgardo Ramos denied the request, citing a decision that declined to remove a judge based on a litigant’s dissatisfaction with earlier rulings.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Komatsu v. The City of New York · No. 1:20-cv-07046
Judge
Edgardo Ramos
Date
Oct. 5, 2020

Background

The case was assigned to the court and Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein on September 29, 2020. On October 2, 2020, Komatsu filed a letter asking the court to terminate Judge Gorenstein’s designation. Komatsu based the request on actions Judge Gorenstein had taken in a prior related proceeding. The opinion does not provide further details about those actions.

Ruling

Judge Edgardo Ramos denied the request. The court cited a prior Southern District of New York decision that declined to remove a judge based on a litigant’s dissatisfaction with that court’s earlier rulings. The order stated, “The request is DENIED.”

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.