Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 6, 2020

Janes v. Berryhill

Judge
George Daniels
Docket
1:18-cv-05054
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Fee PetitionSocial Security
In one sentence

In Janes v. Berryhill, Judge Daniels granted counsel $20,000 in fees and required refund of $6,447.78 in earlier fees.

Who this affects

Sean Janes and his attorney were affected: counsel received a $20,000 fee award, and counsel was directed to refund Janes $6,447.78 previously awarded under the Equal Access to Justice Act.

What happened

Janes v. Berryhill concerned attorney’s fees after Sean Janes successfully challenged the denial of his disability benefits and obtained a remand for further proceedings.

After the remand, the Social Security Administration awarded Janes past-due benefits. His lawyer asked for $29,000 in additional fees, while a magistrate judge recommended $20,000 and a refund to Janes of the earlier $6,447.78 fee award.

Judge Daniels adopted that recommendation and granted the fee motion for $20,000. The order directed counsel to refund the $6,447.78 previously awarded under the Equal Access to Justice Act to Janes.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Janes v. Berryhill · No. 1:18-cv-05054
Judge
George Daniels
Date
Oct. 6, 2020

Background

Sean Janes brought this Social Security Act case seeking review of an administrative law judge’s decision denying him disability insurance benefits. The court entered a stipulated order remanding the case to the Social Security Administration for further proceedings and later entered judgment remanding the case.

Janes’s counsel then received an award of $6,447.78 under the Equal Access to Justice Act, a federal law allowing certain attorney-fee awards against the government. After the remand, the administrative law judge found that Janes was entitled to past-due disability benefits beginning in December 2013. The Social Security Administration issued a notice awarding Janes $93,748.70. Counsel moved for $29,000 in fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), stating that amount was below the 25 percent contingency fee in the retainer agreement. Counsel sought a net payment of $22,552.22 after crediting the earlier $6,447.78 fee award.

Report and Recommendation

Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron recommended awarding counsel $20,000 under § 406(b) and requiring counsel to refund the previously awarded $6,447.78 in Equal Access to Justice Act fees to Janes. No party objected to the recommendation. Judge Daniels reviewed it for clear error and found none.

Ruling

Judge Daniels adopted the recommendation in full. The court granted counsel’s motion for attorney’s fees in the amount of $20,000 and directed counsel, upon receiving that amount, to refund the $6,447.78 Equal Access to Justice Act award to Janes. The Clerk of Court was directed to close the motion.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.