Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 7, 2020

Henderson v. Sanders

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:18-cv-08473
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Motion to DismissCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Henderson v. Sanders, Judge Swain denied amendment, granted dismissal, denied appeal fee status, and closed the case.

Who this affects

Sherrance Henderson’s complaint was dismissed after the court denied leave to amend; the judgment also denied fee-free status for any appeal and closed the case.

What happened

In Henderson v. Sanders, Sherrance Henderson asked to amend the complaint, and a defendant moved to dismiss it. The judgment does not state the claims or the parties’ arguments.

The court denied Henderson’s motion for leave to amend and granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss. It also ruled that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for an appeal.

Judge Laura Swain’s October 7, 2020 judgment states that the case was closed. The judgment refers to a separate memorandum order for the reasons, but that order is not included here.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Henderson v. Sanders · No. 1:18-cv-08473
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Oct. 7, 2020

Background

Sherrance Henderson was the plaintiff, and Eric Sanders and other defendants were named in the caption. The judgment itself does not identify the claims in the complaint or explain the parties’ positions. It states that the court’s reasons were provided in a memorandum order dated October 7, 2020, but that memorandum order is not included in the supplied text.

Motions and ruling

The judgment states that Henderson’s motion for leave to amend the complaint was denied. It also states that the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint was granted. Because the ruling grants a motion to dismiss and the supplied text does not provide further merits analysis, this summary cannot state the specific basis for dismissal.

Appeal and disposition

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied fee-free status for purposes of an appeal. The judgment states that the case was closed. The document was dated October 7, 2020, and was signed by the clerk of court through a deputy clerk; the judge is identified here from the supplied case metadata as Judge Laura Swain.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.