Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 8, 2020

Moshik Nadav Typography LLC v. Banana Republic, LLC

Judge
Jesse Furman
Docket
1:20-cv-08325
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureCivil Rights
In one sentence

In Moshik Nadav Typography v. Banana Republic, Judge Furman ordered the complaint amended to properly allege citizenship for diversity jurisdiction.

Who this affects

Moshik Nadav Typography LLC was required to amend its complaint to provide the missing citizenship allegations; Banana Republic, LLC was the affected defendant. The order warned that the complaint would be dismissed if complete diversity could not be truthfully alleged.

What happened

Moshik Nadav Typography LLC sued Banana Republic, LLC, claiming federal court jurisdiction based on the parties’ citizenship.

The court explained that an LLC has the citizenship of every member. The complaint alleged citizenship for the parties but did not identify the citizenship of each person or entity making up Banana Republic, LLC.

Judge Jesse M. Furman ordered the plaintiff to amend its complaint by October 21, 2020. The order states that if the plaintiff could not truthfully allege complete diversity, the complaint would be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction without further notice.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Moshik Nadav Typography LLC v. Banana Republic, LLC · No. 1:20-cv-08325
Judge
Jesse Furman
Date
Oct. 8, 2020

Background

Moshik Nadav Typography LLC brought the action against Banana Republic, LLC. The complaint invoked diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 and alleged that the plaintiff was a citizen of New York and that the defendant was a citizen of Delaware.

Court’s analysis

The court explained that a limited liability company is considered a citizen of every state of which its members are citizens. Therefore, a complaint relying on diversity jurisdiction must identify the citizenship of each person or entity that makes up an LLC. For corporate members, the complaint must allege the place of incorporation and principal place of business; for LLC members, it must also identify the citizenship of their members.

The court found that the complaint did not provide this information for the entities and persons comprising Banana Republic, LLC. As a result, the complaint did not properly allege diversity jurisdiction.

Order

The court ordered Moshik Nadav Typography LLC to amend its complaint by October 21, 2020, to allege the citizenship of each constituent person or entity comprising Banana Republic, LLC. Judge Jesse M. Furman further ordered that, if the plaintiff could not truthfully allege complete diversity of citizenship by that date, the complaint would be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction without further notice. The opinion does not state that the complaint was dismissed at that time.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.