Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 8, 2020

Sadowski v. Render Media Inc.

Judge
Paul Gardephe
Docket
1:17-cv-09045
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
8
Intellectual PropertyCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Sadowski v. Render Media, Judge Gardephe adopted an award of $25,000 damages, $2,625 fees, and $517 costs after Defendant’s default.

Who this affects

Christopher Sadowski received the monetary awards. Render Media Inc. was held liable by default and was ordered to pay $25,000 in statutory damages, $2,625 in attorney’s fees, and $517 in costs.

What happened

In Sadowski v. Render Media Inc., photographer Christopher Sadowski alleged that Render Media used his copyrighted crime-scene photograph on its website without permission.

Render Media did not respond to the lawsuit or participate in the damages proceedings. Magistrate Judge James L. Cott recommended awarding Sadowski $25,000 in statutory damages, $2,625 in attorney’s fees, and $517 in costs.

Judge Gardephe found no clear error and adopted the recommendation in its entirety. The court awarded those amounts, directed the Clerk to enter judgment, and closed the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Sadowski v. Render Media Inc. · No. 1:17-cv-09045
Judge
Paul Gardephe
Date
Oct. 8, 2020

Background

Christopher Sadowski, a professional photographer, alleged that he owned the copyright in a photograph of a crime scene. He alleged that Render Media Inc., which operated a website, published an article prominently featuring the photograph without his permission or a license. The complaint alleged that Sadowski owned a valid copyright and that Render Media copied and used the photograph without authorization.

Default and Recommendation

Render Media was served with the complaint but did not answer or otherwise respond. It also did not appear at a hearing concerning entry of a default and did not submit materials during the later damages proceedings. The court entered an Order of Default and referred the case to Magistrate Judge James L. Cott for an inquiry into damages.

Judge Cott recommended $25,000 in statutory damages under the Copyright Act, $2,625 in attorney’s fees, and $517 in costs. Neither party objected to the report and recommendation. The district court therefore reviewed it for clear error and found none.

Court’s Analysis

The court explained that a default establishes liability based on well-pleaded allegations, but does not automatically establish the amount of damages. The complaint adequately alleged ownership of a valid copyright and unauthorized copying, so Render Media’s liability was established through its default.

For damages, the court applied the Copyright Act’s statutory-damages range of $750 to $30,000 for the infringement at issue. It agreed that $25,000 was appropriate after considering the factors identified in the report and recommendation, including deterrence and the defendant’s conduct. The court concluded that the full $30,000 requested by Sadowski was not warranted because the opinion did not identify continued infringement after notice to stop.

The court also adopted the recommendation for $2,625 in attorney’s fees and $517 in costs. The fee award reflected 7.5 hours at $350 per hour after reducing the hours claimed for preparing the complaint and the default-judgment motion.

Disposition

Judge Gardephe adopted Judge Cott’s report and recommendation in its entirety. The court awarded Sadowski $25,000 in statutory damages, $2,625 in attorney’s fees, and $517 in costs. It directed the Clerk of Court to enter judgment and close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 8-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.