Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 13, 2020

Nunez v. Cross Bronx and Across New York Live Poultry Inc.

Judge
Lorna Schofield
Docket
1:19-cv-09293
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
FlsaFee PetitionCivil Procedure
In one sentence

Nunez v. New York Live Poultry: Judge Schofield approved the amended Fair Labor Standards Act settlement and granted counsel $15,536.

Who this affects

Euripedes Frias Nunez, plaintiff’s counsel, and the defendants were affected: the settlement was approved, counsel received $15,536, and the remainder was to go to Nunez.

What happened

Euripedes Frias Nunez sued New York Live Poultry, Inc., LLC, and other defendants under the Fair Labor Standards Act, a federal wage law. The parties submitted a proposed settlement and supporting information about expenses and costs.

The court initially did not approve the settlement and gave the parties an opportunity to amend it. They then filed an executed amendment.

Judge Schofield approved the amended settlement as fair and reasonable. She granted counsel’s request for $15,536, and ordered that the rest of the settlement go to Nunez.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Nunez v. Cross Bronx and Across New York Live Poultry Inc. · No. 1:19-cv-09293
Judge
Lorna Schofield
Date
Oct. 13, 2020

Background

This action arose under the Fair Labor Standards Act, a federal law governing wages and working conditions. The parties submitted a joint letter and proposed settlement agreement, along with documents supporting the requested expenses and costs.

The court did not initially approve the settlement agreement. It gave the parties an opportunity to amend the agreement, and the parties later filed an executed amendment.

Ruling

The court approved the settlement agreement as amended, finding it fair and reasonable based on the nature and scope of Nunez’s claims and the risks and expenses of continued litigation. The court also granted plaintiff’s counsel’s request for $15,536. The remaining settlement amount was to be distributed to Nunez.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.