Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 13, 2020

Solomon v. American Federation of State

Full caption

Solomon v. American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, District Council 37, AFL-CIO

Judge
George Daniels
Docket
1:19-cv-06823
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureMotion to Dismiss
In one sentence

In Solomon v. American Federation, Judge Daniels granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss after Solomon conceded Second Circuit precedent foreclosed his requested relief.

Who this affects

The order affected plaintiff Scott Solomon and defendant American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, District Council 37, AFL-CIO, by granting the defendant’s motion to dismiss.

What happened

In Solomon v. American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, District Council 37, AFL-CIO, Scott Solomon opposed the defendant’s motion to dismiss his complaint.

The defendant argued that the court lacked authority to hear the case and that the complaint did not state a valid claim. Solomon acknowledged that a recent Second Circuit decision, Wholean v. CSEA SEIU Local 2001, prevented the relief he sought and required dismissal.

The court granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss, closed the motion, and canceled the scheduled conference. Judge George B. Daniels issued the order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Solomon v. American Federation of State · No. 1:19-cv-06823
Judge
George Daniels
Date
Oct. 13, 2020

Background

Scott Solomon was the plaintiff, and American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, District Council 37, AFL-CIO, was the defendant. The opinion does not describe the underlying legal claims or the specific relief Solomon sought.

Motion and Parties’ Positions

On May 26, 2020, the defendant moved to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), which concerns the court’s subject-matter jurisdiction, and Rule 12(b)(6), which concerns whether a complaint states a legally valid claim. In responding, Solomon conceded that a recent decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit—Wholean v. CSEA SEIU Local 2001, 955 F.3d 332 (2d Cir. 2020)—foreclosed the relief he sought. Solomon therefore acknowledged that Wholean required the court to grant the defendant’s motion.

Ruling

Judge George B. Daniels granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss. The order directed the Clerk of Court to close the motion and canceled the conference scheduled for October 21, 2020, at 9:45 a.m. The opinion does not state whether the dismissal was with or without prejudice.

Classification

This is a procedural order because the court ruled on a motion under Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6), rather than issuing a merits decision on the underlying legal claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.