Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 14, 2020

Joseph v. Edwards

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:20-cv-07412
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Joseph v. Edwards, Judge McMahon ordered released plaintiff Christopher Joseph to pay fees or submit an amended poverty application within 30 days.

Who this affects

Christopher Joseph, who must either pay the required fees or submit an amended application to proceed without prepaying them; the action will be dismissed without prejudice to refiling if he does not comply.

What happened

In Joseph v. Edwards, Christopher Joseph filed the action while incarcerated, but he was released after filing. The court therefore said his obligation to pay fees would depend on whether he qualified to proceed without prepaying them.

The court ordered Joseph, within 30 days, either to pay $400 in filing and administrative fees or submit an amended application to proceed without prepaying fees. No summons would issue at that time.

Judge Colleen McMahon warned that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the action without prejudice to refiling. The court also denied fee-free status for any appeal from the order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Joseph v. Edwards · No. 1:20-cv-07412
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
Oct. 14, 2020

Background

Christopher Joseph filed this action while incarcerated at Fishkill Correctional Facility. The action was initially filed in the Eastern District of New York and was transferred to the Southern District of New York. Because Joseph was incarcerated when he filed the complaint, the Prison Litigation Reform Act applied to him at that time, even though he was later released. The opinion states that the Act can require a prisoner proceeding without prepaying fees to pay the filing fee in installments and can limit that status for prisoners who have accumulated three qualifying dismissals.

After Joseph notified the Eastern District that he had been released, public records confirmed his release. The court explained that a released prisoner’s obligation to pay fees is determined like that of any other non-prisoner, based on whether the person qualifies to proceed without prepaying fees. The opinion also notes that prisoners must exhaust available prison administrative remedies, but this order does not decide whether Joseph satisfied that requirement.

Order

Because Joseph’s financial circumstances may have changed after his release, the court ordered him to do one of two things within 30 days of the order: pay $400 in required fees, consisting of a $350 filing fee and a $50 administrative fee, or complete and submit an amended application to proceed without prepaying fees. The amended application had to identify docket number 20-CV-7412 (CM). The Clerk was directed to mail the order to Joseph and record service on the docket. No summons was to issue at that time.

If Joseph failed to comply within the allowed period, the court stated that it would dismiss the action without prejudice to his refiling it. The order itself did not dismiss the action. The court also certified that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for purposes of an appeal. Judge Colleen McMahon issued the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.