Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 13, 2020

HomeAway.com, Inc. v. City of New York

Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Docket
1:18-cv-07742
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureFee Petition
In one sentence

In HomeAway.com v. City of New York, Judge Engelmayer granted HomeAway’s request to file redacted attorney billing records under seal.

Who this affects

HomeAway.com, Inc., which was permitted to file the attorney billing exhibit in redacted form under seal; the order also concerns the parties and counsel who received notice through the court’s electronic filing system.

What happened

In HomeAway.com, Inc. v. City of New York, HomeAway asked to file a redacted exhibit supporting its request for attorney’s fees and costs.

The exhibit contained attorney billing records. HomeAway said the redacted descriptions revealed protected attorney-client communications, work product, litigation strategy, or the nature of legal services, and it filed an unredacted copy under seal.

Judge Paul A. Engelmayer granted HomeAway’s request to file the exhibit in redacted form.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
HomeAway.com, Inc. v. City of New York · No. 1:18-cv-07742
Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Date
Oct. 13, 2020

Background HomeAway.com, Inc. asked the court for permission to file in redacted form an exhibit supporting its motion for attorney’s fees and costs. The exhibit consisted of attorney billing records.

Request and stated basis HomeAway said the redacted portions described attorney-client communications, protected attorney work product, litigation strategy, and communications with clients. HomeAway electronically filed an unredacted copy under seal, with the proposed redactions highlighted.

Ruling Judge Paul A. Engelmayer granted the request. The order does not address the underlying motion for attorney’s fees and costs or state the amount of any fee award.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.