Al-Bahloul v. The Republic of Tajikistan
- Andrew Carter
- 1:10-cv-09257
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Al-Bahloul v. The Republic of Tajikistan, Judge Carter granted a request to lift the 30-day stay on enforcing an amended default judgment.
Mohammad Ammar Al-Bahloul may immediately proceed with enforcing the amended default judgment against the Republic of Tajikistan; the Rule 62(a) automatic stay was lifted.
What happened
In Al-Bahloul v. The Republic of Tajikistan, Mohammad Ammar Al-Bahloul obtained a 2011 default judgment confirming arbitration awards against the Republic of Tajikistan. The court later converted that judgment into U.S. currency and entered an amended default judgment on October 8, 2020.
Al-Bahloul asked the court to lift immediately the automatic 30-day pause on enforcing the amended judgment, or alternatively to shorten the pause to 15 days. He argued that the original judgment was entered in 2011, resulted from confirmed arbitration awards, and followed Tajikistan’s failure to appear or defend.
Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr. granted the request to lift the automatic pause, allowing Al-Bahloul to proceed with enforcing the amended default judgment.
The detailed version
- Al-Bahloul v. The Republic of Tajikistan · No. 1:10-cv-09257
- Andrew Carter
- Oct. 15, 2020
Background
Mohammad Ammar Al-Bahloul brought the action to confirm arbitration awards under the Federal Arbitration Act and the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards. The arbitration took place before a panel of the Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce. The court entered a default judgment on April 19, 2011, confirming the arbitration panel’s partial award on jurisdiction and liability and its final award.
On October 8, 2020, the court granted Al-Bahloul’s motion to convert the default judgment into U.S. currency and entered an amended default judgment. The Clerk then notified Al-Bahloul that an abstract of judgment could not be issued until 30 days after entry of the amended judgment because Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 62(a) generally stays execution on a judgment and proceedings to enforce it for 30 days.
Request
Al-Bahloul moved under Rule 62 for an order lifting the automatic stay immediately. He argued that the original judgment had been entered in 2011, so the purpose of the automatic stay had already been served; that the judgment confirmed an arbitration award; and that Tajikistan had received notice of the claims but had not appeared or defended. Al-Bahloul alternatively requested that the stay be shortened to 15 days.
Ruling
Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr. granted Al-Bahloul’s request to lift the Rule 62(a) automatic stay applying to the amended default judgment. The order therefore allowed Al-Bahloul to proceed with execution on and other enforcement of that judgment. The order did not state that the alternative request to shorten the stay was granted.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.