Wojdat v. P3 Global Management, Inc.
- Vyskocil
- 1:19-cv-10339
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Wojdat v. P3 Global Management, Judge Vyskocil discontinued the case after settlement progress, allowing restoration by November 16 or making dismissal with prejudice.
Dominika Wojdat and P3 Global Management, Inc.; the action was discontinued based on the parties’ reported settlement progress, with restoration available by November 16, 2020, and dismissal with prejudice if no restoration request was made by then.
What happened
In Wojdat v. P3 Global Management, Inc., the parties reported that they had agreed on settlement terms in principle and were close to completing and signing the required documents.
The court discontinued the action without costs to either party and allowed either party to ask to restore it to the court’s calendar by November 16, 2020. If no such request was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil entered the dismissal order on October 16, 2020. The order did not decide the underlying dispute.
The detailed version
- Wojdat v. P3 Global Management, Inc. · No. 1:19-cv-10339
- Vyskocil
- Oct. 16, 2020
Background
The parties reported to the court that they had agreed on settlement terms in principle and were close to finalizing and signing the required settlement documents.
Court’s Action
The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to either party. The order stated that the action could be restored to the court’s calendar if an application to restore it was made by November 16, 2020. If no application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice, meaning the action could not be brought again.
Effect of the Order
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil dismissed the action subject to that restoration deadline. The order did not resolve the merits of the parties’ underlying dispute.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.