Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 16, 2020

Garcia Espindola v. Pizza Stop Corp.

Judge
Vernon Broderick
Docket
1:19-cv-01026
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
FlsaCivil ProcedureFee Petition
In one sentence

In Garcia Espindola v. Pizza Stop Corp., Judge Broderick ordered the parties to submit their settlement for fairness review under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Who this affects

The plaintiffs, Pizza Stop Corp., the other defendants, and their counsel were required to submit the settlement terms and a joint fairness explanation within 30 days; if attorney’s fees were included, counsel also had to provide supporting billing records.

What happened

In Garcia Espindola v. Pizza Stop Corp., the parties told the court they had reached a settlement in a Fair Labor Standards Act case. The opinion does not state the settlement’s terms or say that the court approved it.

The court ordered the parties to provide the settlement terms within 30 days. They must also submit a joint letter of no more than five pages explaining why the agreement is a fair and reasonable compromise, including information about five factors the court identified. If the agreement includes attorney’s fees, the parties must provide evidence supporting the amount, including billing records.

Judge Vernon S. Broderick required these submissions so the court could review the settlement under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The order did not decide the underlying wage claims or approve the settlement.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Garcia Espindola v. Pizza Stop Corp. · No. 1:19-cv-01026
Judge
Vernon Broderick
Date
Oct. 16, 2020

Background

The court stated that the parties had reached a settlement in this Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) case. Under the authorities cited by the court, parties generally may not privately settle FLSA claims with prejudice without approval from the district court or the Department of Labor. The court therefore had to determine whether the proposed settlement was fair and reasonable. The opinion does not provide the settlement amount or other terms.

Fairness Review

The court said it would consider the total circumstances, including:

  1. The plaintiffs’ possible recovery;
  2. The extent to which the settlement would help the parties avoid the burdens and expenses of proving their claims and defenses;
  3. The seriousness of the litigation risks;
  4. Whether experienced counsel reached the agreement through arms-length bargaining; and
  5. The possibility of fraud or collusion.

The court also stated that any attorney’s-fee provision must be evaluated separately. Counsel must provide a factual basis for the requested fees, including records showing, for each attorney, the date, hours worked, and nature of the work.

Order

The court ordered the parties to submit the settlement terms within 30 days of the order. Along with those terms, they must submit a joint letter of no more than five pages explaining why the settlement is a fair and reasonable compromise of disputed issues, including information about the five listed factors. If the agreement includes attorney’s fees, the parties must also submit supporting evidence and contemporaneous billing records.

The order required information for the court’s review; it did not approve or reject the settlement and did not decide the merits of the FLSA claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.