Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 16, 2020

Bodoh v. Smith, Jr.

Judge
Louis Stanton
Docket
1:20-cv-08593
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Bodoh v. Smith, Jr., Judge McMahon ordered the prisoner to pay fees or submit authorization to withdraw them from his account.

Who this affects

Jacob Isaiah Bodoh was required to pay the fees or submit a prisoner authorization within 30 days to continue pursuing the action; the case had not yet been screened or decided on the merits.

What happened

In Bodoh v. Smith, Jr., Jacob Isaiah Bodoh, who is incarcerated and representing himself, filed a civil action and submitted an application to proceed without prepaying court fees. He did not submit the required authorization allowing payments to be withdrawn from his prisoner account.

The court gave Bodoh 30 days to pay the $400 in fees or submit the completed prisoner authorization. The order said no summons would issue yet and warned that the action would be dismissed if he did not comply. The Clerk was directed to mail him the order.

Judge Colleen McMahon also ruled that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The order did not decide the underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Bodoh v. Smith, Jr. · No. 1:20-cv-08593
Judge
Louis Stanton
Date
Oct. 16, 2020

Background

Jacob Isaiah Bodoh, who was incarcerated at Sullivan County Jail, brought this civil action without a lawyer. He submitted an application to proceed without prepaying court fees, but he did not submit the required prisoner authorization.

Under the cited federal statutes, a prisoner seeking to proceed without prepaying fees must submit both the fee application and an authorization directing the correctional facility to deduct the filing fee from the prisoner's account in installments. The authorization also directs the facility to provide certified copies of the prisoner's account statements for the prior six months. The order explained that the total fees were $400: a $350 filing fee and a $50 administrative fee. It also explained that the administrative fee does not apply to a person granted permission to proceed without prepaying fees.

Order

The court ordered Bodoh, within 30 days of the order, to either pay the $400 in fees or complete and submit the prisoner authorization labeled with docket number 20-CV-8593 (CM). The Clerk of Court was directed to mail Bodoh a copy of the order and record service on the docket. No summons was to issue at that time.

The order stated that, if Bodoh complied, the case would be processed under the Clerk's Office procedures. If he failed to comply within the allowed time, the action would be dismissed. The order did not decide the merits of Bodoh's claims.

Appeal and Warning

Judge Colleen McMahon certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The court also cautioned that a later dismissal of a prisoner's action as frivolous, malicious, or for failure to state a claim could count as a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). After three such strikes, a prisoner generally cannot proceed without prepaying fees unless the prisoner faces imminent danger of serious physical injury.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.